Why have laws if libs don't want to follow em?

I don’t know, seems like Al Franken did his penance.

The inner city public schools in NJ by and large are still a ■■■■■■■ mess today as they were 50 years ago even after billions of dollars poured into them. Even the very liberal teachers don’t want to work in those schools and much prefer working in schools in the white wealthy districts.

1 Like

Well the Democrat Party has become the lawless Party. They support the corruption of the higher echelon of the FBI, CIA and DOJ and violence of ANTIFA, BLM, Baltimore, Ferguson and Berkeley riots as well as the filthy squatters of OWS. The toxic poison from the Socialist/Democrats is why we have law enforcement officers having water and concrete thrown at them to police executions and the endless assault on the Border Patrol and ICE.

It’s the sick legacy of the Obama Administration. :angry:

Can you be more specific?

opinion noted

I bet his right hand is protecting his crotch. :wink:

lol, Secret Service warned him of the potential serious threat. The stories they know about her.

OP, what are you talking about? What happened?

I have said that for a long time. I also like the “I frequent their websites for research and get insight.” I wouldn’t even know of those websites if it wasn’t for libs on here naming them.

2 Likes

Me either. Never been to one.

2 Likes

Read more: FPC Announces Another Gun Rights Victory in Federal Court
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

The court ruling continued, “Mr. Wilborn’s brief involuntary emergency examination and treatment under Section 302 of the MHPA does not trigger [18 U.S.C.] Section 922(g)(4) because Mr. Wilborn was never ‘adjudicated as a mental defective’ or ‘committed to a mental institution.’” Thus, it says, the Court finds “that the ex parte decision by a single physician following a Section 302 examination is insufficient to meet the requirements to permanently prohibit Mr. Wilborn from legally acquiring, possessing, or using a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(4).”

You see what they tried to do?

2 Likes

The democrats of the past are not the democrats of today.

They’ve moved so far to the left, I’d imagine a democrat in the 1960’s would be horrified by a glimpse of what the the party represents today.

As far as the laws go, emotions and “the cause” overrule what used to be respect of the law.

I think this is one of the key elements of why the country is so divided.

And a lib apparently…

Mostly. Nadler is still screaming impeachment in his wakeful slumber at work to anyone with a recording device.

They sure skewered Blago.

He must be paying for all the D lawlessness.

saw Trump might commute his sentence after 14 years.

I am OK with it if he does. It will send the libs into another frenzy.

I think 14-15 years time is enough. Many murders serve far less. I consider this my Liberal side.

:balance_scale:

This right here.

The modern day…So when did you stop beating your wife?

Who would ever argue FOR racism?

Well progressives sure PROMOTE the idea every chance they get.

1 Like

This was well written. Incredibly false, but well written.

2 Likes

Spot on.

https://theindependentwhig.com/haidt-passages/haidt/conservatives-understand-liberals-better-than-liberals-understand-conservatives/

The results were clear and consistent. Moderates and conservatives were most accurate in their predictions, whether they were pretending to be liberals or conservatives. Liberals were the least accurate, especially those who described themselves as “very liberal.”

1 Like

Imagine that.

The liberal mind readers are actually lousy at predicting behavior.

They are good at attention seeking behavior.

Excellent find!!

:crystal_ball: