Yet, not a threat to the officer who popped her. No where near.
But you guys don’t mind that. Wonder why
1 Like
There is no wondering about it, they were told the narrative to support and they’re dutifully supporting it like good subjects.
4 Likes
to avoid hitting the officer.
she 100% wasnt trying to run him down.
Allan
So you can shoot a conservative for trespassing but you can’t shoot a lib for any reason.
Driving a car at an officer is fine if you are a lib.
Convoluted “thinking” by Al. 
2 Likes
More like a home invasion with Byrd standing his ground.
1 Like
then why werent all the others shot and killed?
If they were breaching the last line of defense they should have been.
1 Like
She wasn’t breaching any “ last line” nice try
Maybe the rioters should have used SUV’s then you’d defend them
1 Like
Of course she was.
1 Like
you can shoot if you life is danger. good was no threat to the officer.
Allan
Only one of them had a weapon.
1 Like
Her intent didn’t matter. Her car was pointed directly at him at the instant it sped forward. That was the perception … his perception … when he believed his life was in danger. Any reasonable man in his situation could have believed that. And that is the test for using lethal force … the test that Byrd failed.
Byrd was not under attack so that rule does not apply. Had Ashli and the others all come through the door he would not have been molested. As proof of that, the three or four capital employees who were in the stairwell when the protesters swarmed into that space were completely unharmed. In fact, you can’t even hear them being verbally assaulted in the video taken on that side of the locked doors. There was no threat of physical violence let alone to anyone’s life.
And the “home is your castle” rule is completely inappropriate outside the home. Inside your home, you do not need to have an imminent threat to justify shooting an intruder. Anywhere else, including in a place where you are being paid to police it, the imminent threat is required. Bryd did not reside there, he was not being invaded.
2 Likes
That’s laughable (“line of defense”) and it’s not what the law says. If it were, protesters on the streets could be shot down if they cross a police line.
1 Like
Then how come she wasn’t shot at the front door? What made that door the “last line of defense” as opposed to the one behind officer Byrd?
1 Like
And neither was Ashli. At least try to be consistent.
1 Like
The front door wasn’t the last line of defense. That door was.
that was aimed away.
Allan
So we are to believe you over our lying eyes. We have all seen the film, from all the angles.
3 Likes
It was aimed in a way to hit him. The running away to evade arrest may have been her goal, but he was right there in front of her. She was willing to hit him to get away.
2 Likes
