Who knew that Sweden and Poland would be leading the fight for free speech?

it’s not true Nazi unless it comes from the Nazi region of Bavaria.

A sort of Kontrollierte Ursprungsbezeichnung

It’s not true Nazism unless it was before 1945.

It’s not true Marxism unless it’s economic.

Neo is correct in both cases.

1 Like

I give up

As you should when you’re wrong.

1 Like

You don’t understand it.

Of course I do, it’s not complicated.

It’s not complicated and yet… you keep using it incorrectly

No, I’m not.

Godwin’s law doesn’t apply when the references to “NAZI” have merit in the discussion.

Given the background of the Swedish Democrats it appropriate to address their political leanings and why they might be for forcing social media companies to allow all speech.

By doing that… this group, with Nazi beliefs, can have open season on private social media to espouse their views

Yes it does. There are no Nazis. There are Neo-Nazis. There is a huge difference. Any attempt to paint anyone as a Nazi today is nothing more than an attempt at Godwin’s Law. Because Nazis do not exist.

1 Like

Are you a Marxist?

What is the ideological difference between Nazis and Neo-Nazis?

I have a 2015 Honda Accord and bought a 2021 accord… so I guess it’s a Neo-Accord?

Cool then by your own rules… you misapplied Godwin’s law

To this post…

You replied…

It’s the votes that libs care about.

And our government to track…thus the dangers.

They are not Nazis, they are Neo-Nazis. And I am through with this bull feather rationalizations.

Have a nice day.

I believe you but you used Godwin’s law incorrectly by your own standards.

Meanwhile libs are going head on into hybrid of fascism socialism and dictatorial ship.

1 Like

Can you see the posts I deleted? I will admit I got ahead of it and was proved correct. What is the correct spelling of the term?

I’ve been here a long time. I know “clever”.

I would suggest reviewing the TOS. Have a nice day.

I understand.