Simple yes or no.
Should private businesses be forced to provide services they don’t want to?
Simple yes or no.
Should private businesses be forced to provide services they don’t want to?
What is an “organic conversation” as it pertains to Walmart’s comment section?
Keep convincing oneself that.
No, Apple shouldn’t be forced to carry Dell computers.
You’ve failed to demonstrate hypocrisy.
Here are my terms and conditions for service - I don’t make wedding cakes for homosexual weddings, I don’t bake rainbow flag cupcakes for Homosexual Pride Day and I don’t serve people sagging their pants, wearing hoodies or listening to headphones while in my place.
You’re going to have to explain that attempted analogy.
Can’t make the horse drink now can I.
Here are my terms and conditions for service - I don’t make wedding cakes for homosexual weddings, I don’t bake rainbow flag cupcakes for Homosexual Pride Day and I don’t serve people sagging their pants, wearing hoodies or listening to headphones while in my place.
Does that violate public accommodation laws? If no… proceed.
WuWei:
You should ask your friends. Or read the Gramsci link I gave you.
What is an “organic conversation” as it pertains to Walmart’s comment section?
Ask your friends. Or read the article. I thought it sounded strange too, until I found the source.
WuWei:
Here are my terms and conditions for service - I don’t make wedding cakes for homosexual weddings, I don’t bake rainbow flag cupcakes for Homosexual Pride Day and I don’t serve people sagging their pants, wearing hoodies or listening to headphones while in my place.
Does that violate public accommodation laws? If no… proceed.
Ah a legalist argument. “I got mine!”
How sad. How not liberalism.
WuWei:
First clause of his post. Come on man.
Did I misstate his argument?
Yes, you did. And you know it.
You’re going to have to explain that attempted analogy
Apple is a computer company.
They sell computers.
Your question
Should private businesses be forced to provide services they don’t want to?
Just because Apple sells THEIR computers, doesn’t mean they should be forced to sell ALL computers. This of course assumes they are not in violation of any other laws.
Yes, you did. And you know it.
Explain it, please
So you
Tsk, tsk…
conan:
I’m advocating the same rights as gay couple argued did to that baker…or photographer.
Is speech illegal?
So you do agree with public accommodation laws?
And you think that they should be expanded?
Read his post again and put down your framing hammer before you break something.
WuWei:
You’re going to have to explain that attempted analogy
Apple is a computer company.
They sell computers.
Your question
WuWei:
Should private businesses be forced to provide services they don’t want to?
Just because Apple sells THEIR computers, doesn’t mean they should be forced to sell ALL computers. This of course assumes they are not in violation of any other laws.
Twitter doesn’t manufacture speech, remember?
I am a baker. I don’t make homosexual wedding cakes. You are forcing me to, like forcing Apple to sell Dell computers. That’s you, not me.
Does Dell computers have a right to ban what you put on their computers?
Ah a legalist argument. “I got mine!”
Public accommodation applies to Twitter and the Baker.
WuWei:
Ah a legalist argument. “I got mine!”
Public accommodation applies to Twitter and the Baker.
No it doesn’t.
Jezcoe:
Simple yes or no.
Should Private platforms should be forced to carry content that they do not want to?
Simple yes or no.
Should private businesses be forced to provide services they don’t want to?
No.
But I am a straight white guy so it is likely not going to affect me.
Hannity Community
The official community forum of Sean Hannity. Join the conversation with fellow conservatives on the issues that matter most.