Who knew that Sweden and Poland would be leading the fight for free speech?

Simple yes or no.

Should private businesses be forced to provide services they don’t want to?

What is an “organic conversation” as it pertains to Walmart’s comment section?

Keep convincing oneself that.

No, Apple shouldn’t be forced to carry Dell computers.

You’ve failed to demonstrate hypocrisy.

Here are my terms and conditions for service - I don’t make wedding cakes for homosexual weddings, I don’t bake rainbow flag cupcakes for Homosexual Pride Day and I don’t serve people sagging their pants, wearing hoodies or listening to headphones while in my place.

You’re going to have to explain that attempted analogy.

Can’t make the horse drink now can I.

Does that violate public accommodation laws? If no… proceed.

Ask your friends. Or read the article. I thought it sounded strange too, until I found the source.

Ah a legalist argument. “I got mine!”

How sad. How not liberalism.

1 Like

Yes, you did. And you know it.

Apple is a computer company.

They sell computers.

Your question

Just because Apple sells THEIR computers, doesn’t mean they should be forced to sell ALL computers. This of course assumes they are not in violation of any other laws.

Explain it, please

Tsk, tsk…

Read his post again and put down your framing hammer before you break something.

Twitter doesn’t manufacture speech, remember?

I am a baker. I don’t make homosexual wedding cakes. You are forcing me to, like forcing Apple to sell Dell computers. That’s you, not me.

1 Like

Does Dell computers have a right to ban what you put on their computers?

Public accommodation applies to Twitter and the Baker.

No it doesn’t.

1 Like

No.

But I am a straight white guy so it is likely not going to affect me.