Whitaker Testimony


#82

Funny thing about a “perjury trap” - all you have to do is either:

  1. Tell the truth, or
  2. Invoke your 5th amendment rights

#83

Ya except for you know, manafort failing to register as a foreign agent for pro russian ukranian oligarchs, laundering money for them, and Trump/associates sogning LOIs with sanctioned russian banks and lying about all their contacts and business dealings during the campaign. Zero evidence. Proof? No. Evidence. Oh yes.


#84

Did he make false statements in that interview?


#85

So we agree… Flynn was never charged with perjury and therefore could not have been a “victim” of a “perjury trap”.


#86

When Donald Trump said “don’t believe what you read and see”, there is obviously a certain segment of the population he was speaking to. Blind allegience to a politician, especially a billionaire New York real estate mogul, is comical.


#88

Ukranian is not Russian.

There’s been zero evidence of any illegal activity between the campaign and the Russians no matter how you want to spin it.


#89

I’m sure you think you have a point in there somewhere. He was forced to pleat to false statements which is perjury in lay terms.


#90

Pro russian ukranian oligarchs with strong financial connections to the Kremlin. I am well aware that it is a matter of fact that ukraine is a separate state.


#91

Do you think we should amend the False Statements Accountability Act of 1996 to allow false statements?


#92

Which doesn’t support the claim that there was any illegal activity between the Russians and the Campaign.


#93

You said there was no evidence. I just gave it to you. And it does support it. It provides motive. Manafort was the campaign chairman


#94

I think in order to charge someone with a crime for making statements that are not true or completely true you should have to prove there was an intentional act involved.


#95

No you didn’t. Ukrainian is not Russian.


#96

Manafort was the campaign chairman.


#97

And nothing illegal between him and the Russians transpiring when he was part of same has been shown to have occurred.


#98

Are you now moving the goalposts to “proof”?


#99

Do you not believe Flynn when he swore, under oath, that he did intentionally lie?


#100

I haven’t moved anything.

The whole premise for the investigation was that there was “collusion”, which isn’t even a crime, between the campaign and the Russians.


#101

There is most definitely a pro-Russia faction within the Ukraine which is where most of the connections lie


#102

How did Flynn’s admission not prove that?