When will you apologize to Seth Rich?

[Paul_Thomson]

What about exploiting the dead by illegally voting in their names. Is that OK?

[Grabbie]

@Paul_Thomson

What about exploiting the dead by illegally voting in their names. Is that OK?

Does that happen a lot in your world?

[Paul_Thomson]

Possibly. Is it OK to do?

[Mountain_Soldier]

Why do I need to apologize to him?

[Grabbie]

@Paul_Thomson

Possibly. Is it OK to do?

Possibly? You don’t know? What’s the point, if you don’t know?

[Mountain_Soldier]

@Excast

@komobu

entertainment radio. It got very little national news coverage.

Thank you for illustrating the massive problem facing basic discourse in out country today. The “national news” generally makes an attempt to approach stories by discussing facts, or at least solid evidence. “Entertainment radio” and much of Fox New’s programming doesn’t deal with facts because it isn’t news based, but all about the opinions of it’s hosts. But that hasn’t stopped tens of millions of conservative Americans from treating them as their primary sources of information.

Unless it makes republicans look bad like CBS likes to do.

[Grabbie]

@Mountain_Soldier

Unless it makes republicans look bad like CBS likes to do.

Republicans have for a while and certainly lately made it only necessary to simply report their actions to make them “look bad.”

[SaysWho]

Name one person.

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

Party of Christian Values.

[Nemesis]

@Smyrna

@party-free

But there are people who treated them the same, though. There are people who believed the conspiracy being peddled about Seth Rich. They slurped down all the drip drip drips. How are those people better than those who believed the Kavanaugh accusers?

There’s merit to it…enough that our host broadcast about it but…not enough to hurt innocent family members of Seth, by continuing the discussion without additional evidence.

Hannity did himself a huge disservice by indulging in the conspiracy talk. Unfortunately he only stopped when Fox decided to retract the story. Its pretty obvious he was told by the Fox News leadership to stop with the conspiracy talk.

[Smyrna]

@PizzaReverend

People who are terrified of flying still fly when they absolutely have to.

That talking point was particularly stupid.

It sounds like you didn’t listen to her testimony? She flew due to wants, not needs…now heed your own advice regarding stupid talking points.

[Bigjohn]

Yes our host sure backed the wrong horse on this one

[Paul_Thomson]

I know it’s happening. I don’t know yet how much. A lot? But you seem incapable of making a judgment on the practice. Why?

[hwyflier]

@Smyrna

Has the FBI ever actually examined the hacked DNC server?

@MoleUK

They have the forensic images, yes.

And obviously the DNC server itself was a virtual one (cloud based), not some lone physical box.

The FBI submitted a lengthy report after examining the server data, detailing exactly how Russian hackers moved through and accessed the DNC servers. It’s in the indictment they filed iirc.

Exclusive: Emails of top NRCC officials stolen in major 2018 hack

Now with news that the NRCC being hacked during the midterms we can look at how the republican’s behaved post hack compared to the democrats.

The NRCC brought on the prominent Washington law firm Covington and Burling as well as Mercury Public Affairs to oversee the response to the hack. The NRCC paid the two firms hundreds of thousands of dollars to help respond to the intrusion. The committee’s chief legal counsel, Chris Winkelman, devoted hours of his time to dealing with the matter.

Note how they didn’t pack up all their computers in the middle of an election and turn them over to the FBI.

They’ve also used Crowdstrike. Seems like similar reactions regarding the servers to me. Image it, hand it to the FBI, run your own investigation as well, work on getting clean and get back online asap.

[hwyflier]

@Paul_Thomson

Has the source of the leaks been found? Who was it? What proof is there for that? At what speed was the data downloaded from the hard drive? Is that speed possible for hacking over the internet? or would it require person to be at the computer itself?

Has the source of the leaks been found?

• yes, as stated clearly by multiple government agencies during the Trump presidency

Who was it?

• GRU

What proof is there for that?

• https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

At what speed was the data downloaded from the hard drive?

• We don’t have that information. I understand you think you do, and you think it’s 23/mb, but you are either a victim of a long disproven hoax, or a purposeful promoter of it.

Briton ran pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign that helped Trump deny Russian...

Is that speed possible for hacking over the internet?

• 23mb? Yes. I’m downloading faster as we speak. However, that number is a hoax number, as shown in the above reporting.

or would it require person to be at the computer itself?

• Sure wouldn’t, but again, your last 3 questions show that you’re either under the spell of Tim Leonard’s file compression hoax, or are for unknown reasons promoting it willingly.

Briton ran pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign that helped Trump deny Russian...

There is nothing supporting the ring-wing seth rich conspiracy. There are mountains of evidence supporting otherwise. No one but internet weirdos is still trying to push this.

[NebraskaFootball]

@hwyflier

@Paul_Thomson

Has the source of the leaks been found? Who was it? What proof is there for that? At what speed was the data downloaded from the hard drive? Is that speed possible for hacking over the internet? or would it require person to be at the computer itself?

Has the source of the leaks been found?

• yes, as stated clearly by multiple government agencies during the Trump presidency

Who was it?

• GRU

What proof is there for that?

• https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

At what speed was the data downloaded from the hard drive?

• We don’t have that information. I understand you think you do, and you think it’s 23/mb, but you are either a victim of a long disproven hoax, or a purposeful promoter of it.

Briton ran pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign that helped Trump deny Russian links

Is that speed possible for hacking over the internet?

• 23mb? Yes. I’m downloading faster as we speak. However, that number is a hoax number, as shown in the above reporting.

or would it require person to be at the computer itself?

• Sure wouldn’t, but again, your last 3 questions show that you’re either under the spell of Tim Leonard’s file compression hoax, or are for unknown reasons promoting it willingly.

Briton ran pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign that helped Trump deny Russian links

There is nothing supporting the ring-wing seth rich conspiracy. There are mountains of evidence supporting otherwise. No one but internet weirdos is still trying to push this.

Well done sir. Well done indeed!

[Grabbie]

@Paul_Thomson

I know it’s happening. I don’t know yet how much. A lot? But you seem incapable of making a judgment on the practice. Why?

You know it’s happening? Based on what evidence?
What steps have you taken to find out how much?

[sikofit]

@Smyrna

What I believe is there are many, many, many unanswered questions regarding Seth’s murder such as…who did it? What’s trying to be sold here is that this has all been solved and that… .is fake news.

We now know the Seth Rich story was completely fabricated to distract the sheeple.

[Apocalypto]

By Wikileaks and Fox News ran with it full throttle.

[Morgan]

40% of murders in the US go unsolved. 44% in DC without an arrest. This isn’t some super unusual and suspicious situation.