What's The Point Of Hunter Testifying?

[DougBH]

@CanadianJudo

@DougBH

@CanadianJudo

There is no legitimate reason to believe there was corruption according to the Ukrainian government.

If you accept what the Ukrainian government says at face value, then you accept Zelensky’s statement that he did not feel that any pressure was put on him.

again it doesn’t matter if Zelensky feel there was pressure on him, according to the U.S government the President broke the law and illegal denied Congressional funding.

Yes. A minor noncompliance with a budget restriction that resulted in no harm, only a delay of a month or two. Not really worth noting, much less impeaching over.

[CanadianJudo]

@DougBH

@CanadianJudo

There is no legitimate reason to believe there was corruption according to the Ukrainian government.

If you accept what the Ukrainian government says at face value, then you accept Zelensky’s statement that he did not feel that any pressure was put on him.

Trump reason for denying the funding isn’t relevant,
Trump need to prove he was within his power to do so as President.

[altair1013]

@ImRightYoureWrong

The oroblem though is that Senators swore an oath to be impartial. If they admit it’s all for 2020 points, then they broke their oath

Nobody is impartial. Not Shifty, not Pelosi, not Schumer not Liz. Not a single one of them.

[CanadianJudo]

@DougBH

@CanadianJudo

@DougBH

@CanadianJudo

There is no legitimate reason to believe there was corruption according to the Ukrainian government.

If you accept what the Ukrainian government says at face value, then you accept Zelensky’s statement that he did not feel that any pressure was put on him.

again it doesn’t matter if Zelensky feel there was pressure on him, according to the U.S government the President broke the law and illegal denied Congressional funding.

Yes. A minor noncompliance with a budget restriction that resulted in no harm, only a delay of a month or two. Not really worth noting, much less impeaching over.

a minor noncompliance which was violation of office as President.

[DougBH]

Only if you think a minor noncompliance with a budgetary procedure civil statute is worth impeaching…or rather that the Senate will so hold.

[CanadianJudo]

@DougBH

Only if you think a minor noncompliance with a budgetary procedure civil statute is worth impeaching…or rather that the Senate will so hold.

again it show the President isn’t above abusing his office.
abuse of office is abuse of office it doesn’t matter how severe it was.

[DougBH]

@CanadianJudo

@DougBH

Only if you think a minor noncompliance with a budgetary procedure civil statute is worth impeaching…or rather that the Senate will so hold.

again it show the President isn’t above abusing his office.

A minor noncompliance doesn’t rise to the level of an abuse of power in my opinion, if it was a noncompliance. Again, we shall see what the Senate says.

[altair1013]

@CanadianJudo

Trump reason for denying the funding isn’t relevant,
Trump need to prove he was within his power to do so as President.

Actually he isn’t obligated to prove anything. Maybe it works differently up North. The Senate republicans will be assuming he has done nothing wrong. As they should. Then they will vote to acquit. Then what?

[altair1013]

@DougBH

A minor noncompliance doesn’t rise to the level of an abuse of power in my opinion, if it was a noncompliance. Again, we shall see what the Senate says.

Is abuse of power even a crime? I think it’s more of an opinion.

[CanadianJudo]

@altair1013

@CanadianJudo

Trump reason for denying the funding isn’t relevant,
Trump need to prove he was within his power to do so as President.

Actually he isn’t obligated to prove anything. Maybe it works differently up North. The Senate republicans will be assuming he has done nothing wrong. As they should. Then they will vote to acquit. Then what?

what is the point of calling witness if your not trying to prove your innocence.

[CanadianJudo]

@altair1013

@DougBH

A minor noncompliance doesn’t rise to the level of an abuse of power in my opinion, if it was a noncompliance. Again, we shall see what the Senate says.

Is abuse of power even a crime? I think it’s more of an opinion.

impeachment isn’t a criminal process.

[DougBH]

Not fair! Not fair! The Republicans are making their decisions based on partisans politics, unlike the Democrats in the House! Party above country! Vote Democrat!!! Give money to the DNC!

You know thats what.

[ImRightYoureWrong]

@thinkingman

no i didnt. lol

take a breath

Ok. Then how does Hunter biden testimony defend trump against the charges?

[thinkingman]

@Scratch

The GAO report/finding is opinion?

you tell me

[CanadianJudo]

@DougBH

@CanadianJudo

@DougBH

Only if you think a minor noncompliance with a budgetary procedure civil statute is worth impeaching…or rather that the Senate will so hold.

again it show the President isn’t above abusing his office.

A minor noncompliance doesn’t rise to the level of an abuse of power in my opinion, if it was a noncompliance. Again, we shall see what the Senate says.

This is where we disagree because Trump knowing abusing his office even in a minor infraction show he is unfit for public office.

[Scratch]

As is a guilty verdict of a jury. Is it a crime or is it just the jurors opinion?

[ImRightYoureWrong]

@DougBH

Not fair! Not fair! The Republicans are making their decisions based on partisans politics, unlike the Democrats in the House! Party above country! Vote Democrat!!! Give money to the DNC!

You know thats what.

The witnesses called by the democrats were all relevant to the charges brought forth by the prosecution. What relevance does hunter have to the defense?

[altair1013]

@CanadianJudo

what is the point of calling witness if your not trying to prove your innocence.

To discredit the prosecution and to score political points. All of the burden of proof is on the prosecution. 100 percent. What will we be doing in a month after the dems have failed to remove the President?

[CanadianJudo]

@altair1013

@CanadianJudo

what is the point of calling witness if your not trying to prove your innocence.

To discredit the prosecution and to score political points. All of the burden of proof is on the prosecution. 100 percent. What will we be doing in a month after the dems have failed to remove the President?

Having 2020 general election.

[Camp]

The Ukrainian President said no pressure.