If I do end up killing the thief, it would be the result of escalation. Like how no one is legally shot for possessing marijuana but are legally shot fir violently resisting arrest.
But if they’re already a distance away from me, then I do not shoot. It should qualify as manslaughter or murder.
“…woe to him who creeps through the serpent windings of utilitarianism to discover some advantage that may discharge him from the justice of punishment…” — Immanuel Kant
Saf…you know well enough that your justness in shooing the Mormons away—I think I might have agreed with it, but I cannot remember—doesn’t have any bearing on whether trespass is ontologically equivalent to appropriation. No need to resort to silly metaphysics to make what is otherwise a good point.
And yet I’ll bet you support all the rioting, burning and looting done by people who were not cut, bruised or otherwise touched by the murder of someone else don’t you?
Yep. It depends what you mean by “stuff”. If we are talking about an old tv that is covered under insurance I’m not going to shoot. If he is somehow making off with gold bars that I have worked my whole life for and are necessary for my retirement years, he is out of luck.
The word “stuff” implies it isnt that much.
I’m not going to judge where another person draws a line with a thief.
I don’t want thieves to know ahead of time where the line will be drawn.