Where did I say human trafficking is a minor offense?
What does that have to do with the fact that I support bringing criminal charges and sending convicted criminals to prison?
Don’t deport criminals thatg have committed crimes until they have served their prison sentence - then deport them.
WW
lol.
Allan
The court of public opinion means a lot. That is the court that decided the opinion of the NYC court and official decision that Trump was a felon 34 times over was garbage. That is the court that made him our President again.
TPC 38.02. lol
Your link is a paywall. And you either didn’t read it or don’t understand it.
The case you are trying to use is Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada
it means squat when it comes to court cases.
if it did abortion would not be banned in several states.
when it comes to court cases we dont need mob rule
Allan
An Obama appointed judge had ruled that Trump could not remove the temporary protected status of 300k Venezuelans basically because she disagreed with the decision to do so even though the law creating this status leaves the decision up to the President.
Today, the Supreme Court reversed this decision, leaving TPS up to the President.
Judge Jackson dissented.
This will actually affect the status of around 600k Venezuelans and Haitians that Biden flew in at the last minute.
Whether Trumps decision was good or bad, at least this establishes that the Supreme Court recognizes that, even when it may disagree with the President, the court cannot play President.
They are recognizing limits to their own power in favor of the elected branches, and that is a good thing.
Did I read that correctly as an 8-1 decision? 
Yes you did. Jackson was odd one out. But again she’s not even a judge.
So the only one who wanted to protect the invaders was the one appointed by the Dementor in Chief? Go figure. 
I thought this was an interesting quote from the VP:
“You cannot have a country where the American people keep on electing immigration enforcement and the courts tell the American people they’re not allowed to have what they voted for. That’s where we are right now,” Vance continued.
Isn’t Vance attacking the basis of our federal system? We have elected representatives and the electoral college to prevent “mob rule,” or people voting to violate the Constitution. That’s why we’re not a true democracy, I’ve been told. The role of the courts is to adjudicate the law, not reflect the ever-changing will of the electorate.
No.
Radical LW judges have nothing to do with adjudicating the law. They need to be reined in. Best if you don’t attempt to cherry pick Vance’s comments, thereby creating a strawman argument.
Is that what you think we’ve been seeing? An unbiased and apolitical judiciary doing their best to interpret the law as written?
She’s a radical leftist political hack imo.
Probably why the Biden administration picked her. 
Best if you don’t call every judge that has ruled against this admin a radical left wing judge without an iota of support
I don’t. I clearly supported Roderiguez’s (a Trump appointee) decision with a lengthy post explaining why.
Radical LW judge rulings are frequently overturned. That, in and of itself, speaks volumes.
Sometimes we agree with judicial decisions and sometimes we don’t. When we don’t, that doesn’t necessarily mean the judges are “activists,” and popular opinion shouldn’t affect their decisions.
Decisions from judges on both sides are frequently overturned. Your partisanship is strong.
Great response. Maybe address the post with some substance instead or your usual troll work?
We have seen in the last few years that the President who appoints the judge tells you more about how the decision will go than the facts of the case.
