What Ohr Really Told Lawmakers: Russians have Trump “Over a Barrel”

Politics
44

But of course any as of yet unproven piece of ■■■■ piece you see about Hillary is gospel and should have her behind bars by now.

I see…

1 Like
45

I keep saying that.

46

Now you understand.

1 Like
47

You sure about that?

48

When you’re dirty you have to go after the cops. detectives, investigators, prosecutors, judges and jury.

49

Have they proven anything true in the dossier? Have they proven anything false/fake?

The dossier is not unproven anymore.

50

Yeah. They have proven a town named Moscow exists. They have proven Trump once went to Moscow for a beauty pageant, they have proven…nothing illegal or salacious.

51

Trump’s army is in denial.

1 Like
54

They party could do it as a requirement to be endorsed, but GOP would probably just ignore it anyway because any party that votes to add Internet Porn is a National Heal crisis and nominates someone who paid a Porn start to Hush about a affairs is beyond trusting.

55

Damn. Didn’t think of it that way.

56

I remember when the “experts” were trying to debunk the Steele Dossier, this was the part in it they hammered the hardest.

Something along the lines of “Putin would never surrender that much financial power”.

Then the secretive trade…executed by Putin alone and catching Rosneft board members completely by surprise…went down…to the EXACT number the Steele Dossier quoted…and this line of attack was never seen again.

Indeed, the Rosneft sale is almost never discussed…and in my mind, it’s the key piece of evidence that shows the Steele Dossier is actually quite sound.

The salacious peeing on the bed part is probably the ONLY part of it that hasn’t really been confirmed…which is doubtless why the CEC focuses on it so much whenever they discuss the dossier.

Well, that and pursue the totally fallacious line that just because it’s opoosition research, it can’t possibly be true.

1 Like