You asked for proof of destruction insdide the capital. I provided it. not much more to say about it.
My man…that was NOT destruction. Here is an example of destruction in a “mostly peaceful protest”. Now show me destruction inside the capitol of the "most violent insurrection in US history.
Now…you do the same…and it should be EASY…IF…you haven’t been sheoplized?
Bu…buh…sLaVeRy!
Dude, what are you talking about?
You asked for proof the inside had been damaged. I provided it.
And you like a good sheep, pivot to other terrible - worse - destruction, instead of admitting the capital had been damaged.
Oh, just wait. I’m sure the next pivot will be “you supported the other destruction!”
He asked for destruction.
He showed you pics of real destruction.
You showed a snowflake-shaped crack in a window.
Once again, we have typical dishonest posts from you.
What exactly quilifyes it for insurection?
“Down with USA”…?
“Blow up the WH”…?.. NO…that was used by Vagina Hats and they were not accused of insurection.
Then what?
It’s so wild that january 6 is no big deal to so many…
Sad really.
Jezcoe: Smyrna:In the United States of America…people are innocent until proven guilty. Now hours and hours and hours and hours of tapes have been released to prove this was the most violent insurrection in our nation’s history. I’m not here to prove innocence…that’s a given in our nation. Where is the evidence of guilt? It doesn’t exist sheople. I’ve told you this from the get/go…it was a set up for the sole intent of keeping Trump out of the WH forever. The shepherds purposefully chose to use the word “insurrection” so they could apply the 14th. Now…show me the proof of guilt inside the capitol where those politicians had to hide due to this level of violence.
Meanwhile… Trump’s team was busy getting the fake elector certificates to DC
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/28/politics/recordings-trump-team-fake-elector-ballots/index.html
Insurrection doesn’t require violence or destruction.
It must be “in their DNA” just like Obama said whites are racist its in their DNA.
It’s so wild that january 6 is no big deal to so many…
Once again, a lie from you.
Arguing that’s it’s not actually an insurrection is not the same as “no big deal”.
Why must you lie?
tnt:It’s so wild that january 6 is no big deal to so many…
Once again, a lie from you.
Arguing that’s it’s not actually an insurrection is not the same as “no big deal”.
Why must you lie?
What a bunch of crap that indicates you are either incapable of following a conversation or you are incapable of having an honest discussion.
Yeeeeeepsy.
It will take yeeeeeaaaars to rebuild.
Plus it must be the venue.
Portland Oregon seage of the down-town for months, murders and other mayhem …that can’t be compared to this autrocities in the Capital.
Do you hear your self !
tnt: Smyrna:I know the words “inside the capitol” are too tough for you to comprehend but…try again.
You’re so silly. Parsing, and parsing, and parsing, and parsing.
But again, neither violence nor destruction are required for an insurrection.
Here is destruction inside the capital. I assume you lacked the courae to click this link the first time:
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/07/us/rioters-capitol-building-damage-photos-trnd/index.html
Here is violence inside the capital;
I can’t imagine why any mature adult would parse ‘violence’ on J6 to inside and outside. It’s idiotic.
What exactly quilifyes it for insurection?
“Down with USA”…?
“Blow up the WH”…?.. NO…that was used by Vagina Hats and they were not accused of insurection.
Then what?
The meaning of INSURRECTION is an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. The insurrectionists in this case were trying to obstruct the business of Congress.
What a bunch of crap
This … coming from you.
SpadeMarlowe: tnt: Smyrna:I know the words “inside the capitol” are too tough for you to comprehend but…try again.
You’re so silly. Parsing, and parsing, and parsing, and parsing.
But again, neither violence nor destruction are required for an insurrection.
Here is destruction inside the capital. I assume you lacked the courae to click this link the first time:
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/07/us/rioters-capitol-building-damage-photos-trnd/index.html
Here is violence inside the capital;
I can’t imagine why any mature adult would parse ‘violence’ on J6 to inside and outside. It’s idiotic.
What exactly quilifyes it for insurection?
“Down with USA”…?
“Blow up the WH”…?.. NO…that was used by Vagina Hats and they were not accused of insurection.
Then what?The meaning of INSURRECTION is an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. The insurrectionists in this case were trying to obstruct the business of Congress.
I think every crook who brakes a law is revolting against the authority.
A bunch of protesters taking over the state buildings for weeks was too…revolting against the authority.
Same in Portland and Oregon…
Same when prisoners take over the prison.
Noone called it insurection.
SpadeMarlowe: tnt: Smyrna:I know the words “inside the capitol” are too tough for you to comprehend but…try again.
You’re so silly. Parsing, and parsing, and parsing, and parsing.
But again, neither violence nor destruction are required for an insurrection.
Here is destruction inside the capital. I assume you lacked the courae to click this link the first time:
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/07/us/rioters-capitol-building-damage-photos-trnd/index.html
Here is violence inside the capital;
I can’t imagine why any mature adult would parse ‘violence’ on J6 to inside and outside. It’s idiotic.
What exactly quilifyes it for insurection?
“Down with USA”…?
“Blow up the WH”…?.. NO…that was used by Vagina Hats and they were not accused of insurection.
Then what?The meaning of INSURRECTION is an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. The insurrectionists in this case were trying to obstruct the business of Congress.
If authority involved is the Capital and protesting in the Capital is insurection, just because Congress critters soiled their pants when tresspassed against,…
THEN… why the Democrat who shot Scalise, the Congressman, wasn’t tried for insurection?
He didn’t shoot him out of love.
If authority involved is the Capital and protesting in the Capital is insurection, just because Congress critters soiled their pants when tresspassed against,…
THEN… why the Democrat who shot Scalise, the Congressman, wasn’t tried for insurection?
He didn’t shoot him out of love.
The protestors were trying to prevent the counting of the electoral votes.
Munimula1: SpadeMarlowe: tnt: Smyrna:I know the words “inside the capitol” are too tough for you to comprehend but…try again.
You’re so silly. Parsing, and parsing, and parsing, and parsing.
But again, neither violence nor destruction are required for an insurrection.
Here is destruction inside the capital. I assume you lacked the courae to click this link the first time:
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/07/us/rioters-capitol-building-damage-photos-trnd/index.html
Here is violence inside the capital;
I can’t imagine why any mature adult would parse ‘violence’ on J6 to inside and outside. It’s idiotic.
What exactly quilifyes it for insurection?
“Down with USA”…?
“Blow up the WH”…?.. NO…that was used by Vagina Hats and they were not accused of insurection.
Then what?The meaning of INSURRECTION is an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. The insurrectionists in this case were trying to obstruct the business of Congress.
I think every crook who brakes a law is revolting against the authority.
A bunch of protesters taking over the state buildings for weeks was too…revolting against the authority.
Same in Portland and Oregon…
Same when prisoners take over the prison.
Noone called it insurection.
which federal election certifications were taking place in Oregon and the State building that was taken over?
Going out on a limb: because they were playing baseball, not legislating. I don’t think the guy who shot Reagan was charged with insurrection either.
TheCapitol insurrectionists were literally trying to interfere with the results of an election.