It absolutely is. Your “logic” is anybody who doesn’t answer all your inane questions is dishonest?
That’s the logic of a 13 year-old girl.
2 Likes
I seem to remember you urging SoTH to release them. If I am confusing you with another poster, apologies.
When some repeatedly parses out questions with answers that are inconvenient to their position, it reveals them as a dishonest debater.
Of course he should release them, they’re the people’s property.
1 Like
Even if releasing them leads to further division?
At some point, shouldn’t he do what is good for america, rather than what is good for him politically - because division is very good for him and his party.
I disagree.
The fact that he knew and understood that he lost but still tried a Hail Mary to remain in power shows him for the UnAmerican Scum that he is.
Of course. We…The People… have a right to the information.
The division isn’t good for you and your party?
1 Like
I was speaking from a legal perspective.
I agree, the obvious truth that he knew he lost, yet blundered on makes him even worse, but I don’t think legally it has bearing.
That’s ridiculous. There is nothing more “American” than a “hail mary” (in this context.)
Why the very term…
1 Like
Well, sure…release them. I don’t think he should blur the faces though.
Not as much. it’s all MAGA has at this point, so it’s vital to them.
Didn’t you just make a post decrying the use of the lord’s name in vain? But mother mary is ok?
And also ■■■? Trumps actions to overturn the election are not some Apple Pie Last Second Game Saving Play! That should be praised.
Why not?
You can’t be serious.
Fair enough
Did I say it is “ok”? Do you not understand grammar? What does the Good Book say about it?
Did I praise it?
You seem to have issues distinguishing perspective from perception.
Is that statement a fact?
What if it had worked?
But incorrect.
I think it’s un-American to try to stay in power knowing you lost. How about you?
How so?
Quitting is un-American.
1 Like
We have a right to know who was there doing what.
Editing the full context of the tapes is a political game.
If he said or did evidence that can prove he knew he lost, it goes to intent for the later actions. Such as Meadow’s testimony he did.
It matters a great deal.
