No, those who really care about this country don’t want it torn apart by this utter farce. From the article you reference:
“While the White House’s publicly-released notes of the call show the US president made no direct mention of offering aid in exchange for Zelensky’s assistance in probing former Vice President Joe Biden, …”
That’s right, there is not explicit offer of an exchange for an investigation. It is all reading into it and assuming, because Trump is so bad int their eyes, that there must have been a quid pro quo. If you want a real quid pro quo, go to where Biden demands the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor in exchange for a billion dollars of our tax money. He brags about doing it.
Here we are talking about an actual impeachment based on reading between the lines by people who clearly hated Trump before he was even elected. You need someone really good at connecting the dots to put that over. Perhaps Glenn Beck is available to lead the hearing?
As far as actual referenced crimes the article says:
“The most obvious way in which Trump could have violated the law is by soliciting material campaign aid from a foreign government, which expressly violates the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971.”
So we art talking about impeaching a President over a campaign violation. If you want to see the hurdles that would have to meet, just go to the Mueller report on the section about the meeting at Trump tower.
First, you are going to have to show that this was related to his campaign and that it was not a search for actual facts that should concern all Americans. If you let the three year search for collusion pass the smell test with you, this one should go by easily.
Then you have the question as to whether an investigation is what was meant by that statute, whether the search for information can be criminalized under the 1st amendment, and whether Trump knew what he was doing was illegal. Then you need to establish the dollar value.
And finally, there is an alternative basis for withholding the funds discussed in the very conversation involved…namely that other countries are not paying their share
No, there is nothing there. Impeachment by innuendo doesn’t do it, no matter how much one pretends they are doing it “for the country” instead of for “personal political gain”.