Nancy Pelosi: He told me it was perfect. There was nothing in the call. But I know what was in the call. I mean, it was in the public domain. He didn’t even know that it was wrong. You know, he was saying, “It was perfect. There was nothing wrong.” Well, no, it is wrong. It is wrong for a president to say that he wants you-- another head of state-- to create something negative about his possible political opponent to his own advantage, at the expense of our national security, his oath of office to the Constitution and the integrity of our elections.
The facts are these: on July 25, Mr. Trump was celebrating his new defense secretary in public, but two hours before, he spoke with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Zelensky was interested in Javelin anti-tank missiles to defend himself from Russian-backed rebels."
But it wasn’t public domain at that time. How did she “know what was in the call”??
This is what happens when you put a trainwreck of a weak, mumbling, bumbling woman like nancy pelosi in charge of running things. She can’t even remember her lies and goes on national television and embarrasses herself.
Trump and Giuliani had already admitted that they asked Ukraine to look into Hunter Biden, so it was already in the public domain. The release of the call readout the next day merely confirmed what Trump and and Giuliani said.
No, I’m quibbling over “letter”. She doesn’t say that she knew what was in the letter. She says that she knew what was in the call, which she did because both Trump and Giuliani admitted it.
Not only that but she also said “he didn’t even know” it was (supposedly) wrong as in “nointent” and didn’t that defense work for Hillary? I do believe it did and she went on to get the Dem nominination for President.
Every time a Democrat poll opens their mouth exposes their hypocrisy and double standard of “its good for us but not for you” authoritarian mentality and that’s why we have to get these people out of office and positions of power.
Well, the funny thing is that no one has yet stated what law Trump was supposed to have broken. Its more like “we really, really, really don’t like what he said…as we interpret it”. Its not like anyone has cited a statute.
Here you go. There are a number of articles that also spell it out quite clearly. And remember, a specific law does not need to have been broken for him to be impeached. What he did was wrong. Period. To those of us that actually care about this country, and what our elected employees do with the power we grant to them, we see that this matters and it is WRONG!
Illegally soliciting campaign help from a foreign government
An impeachment is about violation of the oath of office which is why the founders wisely used the vague language “High Crimes and Misdemeanors.” Trump’s supporters have already established the irrelevance of law to the Presidency by their insistence that a sitting President cannot be indicted.
