you believe that?
Climate change: New idea for sucking up CO2 from air shows promise
A new way of removing carbon from the air is up to three times more effective than current technology.
you believe that?
Whatâs unbelievable about it?
Even if you donât believe the department of energy for whatever reason, the sheer number of EV batteries getting made using the exact same technology should pass the gut check. Storage will catch up soon.
Not with lithium based batteries it wonât.
Itâs not 2025.
Why are the english starting up their coal plants?
I never believe man when he starts future telling.
I love the way the greenies ignore the strip mining involved with lithium.
Plus they ignore green power canât keep up with current demand much less the demand millions of ev cars would add to the demand.
I love the way the greenies ignore the strip mining involved with lithium.
Religiosity requires overlooking.
Joe Rogan footage of the Kobalt mines used for most of the batteries the greenies want.
Footage of the mine is at about the 5:30 mark.
This is another aspect of lib hypocrisy. They love to get up on their soap boxes with all their phony SELECTIVE moral outrage.
This is another aspect of lib hypocrisy. They love to get up on their soap boxes with all their phony SELECTIVE moral outrage.
Whereâs the âAmerica must pay for the sins of slaveryâ crowd?
Strangely silent when their side is currently doing it to another ethnicity.
Bird genocide by wind turbines that I assume is a negative and slavery mining for rare earth materials thatâs a negative.
10k+ of birds are struck by airplanes annually. 4k Birds are killed by wind turbines.
Shall we stop flying?
Any slavery is disgusting. The US and the EU could do a lot more to prevent these atrocitiesâŠ
Itâs nice that people are finally getting caught up with production and mining for there favorite green projectâŠand environmental toil it has on our planet.
And than having to deal with waste afterwards.
Iâm ok with killing birds especially pigeons and seagulls I assume itâs a negative though.
The EU and US know fully well about slavery with rare earth metals theyâre not going to stop progress with what these materials do.
I just felt these things were considered negatives as the thread asks to list the negatives.
Ok here is a possible solution, if nothing else it means carbon taxes canât be more than 100 bucks a ton.
A new way of removing carbon from the air is up to three times more effective than current technology.
I would imagine it would get even cheaper if scaled up.
I would like the focus to be on the negative impacts of going green.
One of the worst impacts of going green is that it can require the removal of part or an entire limb to arrest its deadly spread.
10k+ of birds are struck by airplanes annually. 4k Birds are killed by wind turbines.
Shall we stop flying?
Dâ¶
https://www.reuters.com/default/texas-solar-boom-turns-battery-dash-grid-pain-looms-2023-03-15/
At the start of 2022, only 27% of all solar projects in the Texas grid connection queue were coupled with storage and by the end of the year this had risen to 42%, according to preliminary data from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley lab).
Demand for solar and storage in Texas is soaring but many developers are also building separate storage facilities in Texas to take advantage of new tax credits for stand-alone storage in the inflation reduction act. Total planned storage capacity is estimated at 28.5 GW
Thereâs not much time left to doubt.
This conservative has 14.5 kilowatts of solar on his roof, what do you have?
My camper is solar powered.
How come the conservatives around here have solar, but not the libs bitching that there isnât enough solar?
Because it is not free
Isnât it weird how libs fail so hard every time at putting their money where their crow pie is?
âNot in MY backyard!â
âNot from MY wallet!â
Wind farms