Cheap answer. You know exactly what imminent means.
Cheap answer. You know exactly what imminent means.
Don’t be insulting. Sure I do, it’s subjective. Again remember the hindsight from 9/11, Kenya, Benghazi.
FloridaYankee:Cheap answer. You know exactly what imminent means.
Don’t be insulting. Sure I do, it’s subjective. Again remember the hindsight from 9/11, Kenya, Benghazi.
Subjective to a degree perhaps, but it is still a very specific term. There ain’t no cleaning up the mess he made by using it short of proving it out. Even questionable evidence would mean something lol.
“They” both agree that our embassies were threatened.
Esper said “What I’m saying is that I shared the president’s view that probably — my expectation was they were going to go after our embassies”
WuWei: FloridaYankee:Cheap answer. You know exactly what imminent means.
Don’t be insulting. Sure I do, it’s subjective. Again remember the hindsight from 9/11, Kenya, Benghazi.
Subjective to a degree perhaps, but it is still a very specific term. There ain’t no cleaning up the mess he made by using it short of proving it out. Even questionable evidence would mean something lol.
Is it specific? What are the criteria?
FloridaYankee: WuWei: FloridaYankee:Cheap answer. You know exactly what imminent means.
Don’t be insulting. Sure I do, it’s subjective. Again remember the hindsight from 9/11, Kenya, Benghazi.
Subjective to a degree perhaps, but it is still a very specific term. There ain’t no cleaning up the mess he made by using it short of proving it out. Even questionable evidence would mean something lol.
Is it specific? What are the criteria?
That it will happen in the very near future without swift action.
WuWei: FloridaYankee: WuWei: FloridaYankee:Cheap answer. You know exactly what imminent means.
Don’t be insulting. Sure I do, it’s subjective. Again remember the hindsight from 9/11, Kenya, Benghazi.
Subjective to a degree perhaps, but it is still a very specific term. There ain’t no cleaning up the mess he made by using it short of proving it out. Even questionable evidence would mean something lol.
Is it specific? What are the criteria?
That it will happen in the very near future without swift action.
Define “very near future”. Define “swift”.
Please.
Can you appreciate how important and tenuous some sources and methods in that region are?
I prefer they clam up unless it is need to know.
That it will happen in the very near future without swift action.
Like climate change?
No. I support the Constitution.
No, you do not.
Nobody believes the imminent threat lie, either.
WuWei:No. I support the Constitution.
No, you do not.
Why do you say that?
The people deserve to know there really was an imminent threat… Some of us have children and loved ones over there being put in harm’s way.
That isn’t how it works. There are no “children” over there.
Don’t be insulting. Sure I do, it’s subjective. Again remember the hindsight from 9/11, Kenya, Benghazi.
Quite so.
I’d rather us be proactive than reactive.
None of us will ever be privy to the intelligence the CIC is privy to.
They are not going to give anyone in the press or public the details of the exact threats that had been identified nor should they.
To reveal same would jeopardize how the intel was gathered and the sources from whence it was derived.
That isn’t how it works. There are no “children” over there.
There are people born without a mother? Weird…
There are people born without a mother? Weird…
Weird to paint the picture that we have children serving in the military
They are not going to give anyone in the press or public the details of the exact threats that had been identified nor should they.
To reveal same would jeopardize how the intel was gathered and the sources from whence it was derived.
Quite so…
They are not going to give anyone in the press or public the details of the exact threats that had been identified nor should they.
To reveal same would jeopardize how the intel was gathered and the sources from whence it was derived.
Too bad we can’t give this admin the benefit of the doubt. This is the consequence of the habitual lying by Trump.
WildRose:They are not going to give anyone in the press or public the details of the exact threats that had been identified nor should they.
To reveal same would jeopardize how the intel was gathered and the sources from whence it was derived.
Too bad we can’t give this admin the benefit of the doubt. This is the consequence of the habitual lying by Trump.
Credibility?
Zero.
Zip.
Nada.