I’m still laughing. You’d have a point if cnn altered the photo. And if they didn’t, a complaint about the sheriff’s office if they did. But this is just hate flailing at a favorite target.
I just showed you that it looks like the first picture they show is randomized. Click on the link to the article several times and sometimes you will see the photo where you think the Waukesha Sheriff’s Department is trying to fool people into thinking he is white and others you will see the Waukesha Sheriff’s Department photo that shows what you call his “true skin tone”.
Also prevents you from saying what flavor of racist he is, would you prefer black nationalist racist? Can we not say if someone is KKK now because it indicated their color?
Racists are racists because of the content of their character, not the color of their skin. There are racists in every racial group. You know them only by their conduct, not their appearance. Member ship in a racist organization, advocating of racist positions are actions, not appearances. Just remember that the color of a bigot’s skin is not what caused them to be a bigot.
It’s not unreasonable to question media’s playing around with race. Was it NBC that altered that image of the skin color of the half Hispanic Zimmerman? You know, the not so white white Hispanic? And then there were the articles (I referenced one in a previous thread) that emphasized Rittenhouse is white but never mentioned that the ones he shot were white. It’s an established race game much of the media plays.
The Biden administration is far more concerned with putting parents on an FBI watch list for “wrong think” than investigating BLM leaders actually calling for more violence or the Waukesha black supremacist that deliberately plowed into a white crowd. Our media is burying this story for obvious reasons.
you are correct they definitely play these games and it is obvious. some more subtle but they address and present the info very carefully, craft a particular narrative.
they know how to make people think what they want.
Sorry it’s still relevant. members of the victimized group deserve to know which groups are after them. Should we not mention an attacker is a straight man when he kills a gay man because he’s gay? Should we not mention it’s white men under the hoods and sheets? It’s not saying they did it because of their skin color.
I think it is fine to identify the individuals, including publishing their photos. I also think is proper to provide a full description to the public when one or more of these bigots are on the loose. Just make what they are doing, or have done the focus, not what they look like. Cause over coincidence.
It’s odd how there must be complete conformity now with little room for descent. Never thought the democratic party would move so far so fast left that Sanders became the normal and Manchin the outlier.