Not scared of her at all. I’m not the one she’s after.
You’re going to get cold and lonely when they kick you out of the tent. “But…but… I VOTED for you! I supported The Cause!”
Not scared of her at all. I’m not the one she’s after.
You’re going to get cold and lonely when they kick you out of the tent. “But…but… I VOTED for you! I supported The Cause!”
More outrage.
Not scared of her at all. I’m not the one she’s after.
You’re going to get cold and lonely when they kick you out of the tent. “But…but… I VOTED for you! I supported The Cause!”
Throughout history, you can literally count on one hand people or groups of people, who have willingly given up power. It simply doesn’t happen. I see a group of people equating other groups, whether it be gays, minorities, etc getting more rights with them losing power. Then you add in demographic shift and you get the whole “take our country back” mantra.
There is a finite amount of power to be had. I might be first, rest assured you’re on the list.
Well, you screwed that up. I know I’m on the list - at the top. I’m fine with it.
You on the other hand, are in for a big disappointment.
No, it’s all pretty much covering for their preferred brand. Very similar to what “we” like to complain about Fox and other such outlets doing.
How can they cover it when they are not free?
No,
Yes, exactly what I said is true.
When Trump does it, and it’s covered, they’re accused of TDS. When a progressive does it, and it’s covered…something something “not the same.”
How can they cover it when they are not free?
Huh?
10 char
Yes, exactly what I said is true.
When Trump does it, and it’s covered, they’re accused of TDS. When a progressive does it, and it’s covered…something something “not the same.”
The point is her, not them.
What’s going on here? Why is there no outrage?
She’s not yet a representative of the people in any way. She’s a candidate. It’s bad optics because it fuels threads like these, so I’m against it. But instead of being outraged I think I’ll just eat this banana.
MY point is them, not her. Your point proves my point.
She’s not yet a representative of the people in any way. She’s a candidate. It’s bad optics because it fuels threads like these, so I’m against it. But instead of being outraged I think I’ll just eat this banana.
Did you not see the NYT article?
MY point is them, not her. Your point proves my point.
Of course they’re going to cover it, the only thing more important than the DNC and race is themselves.
You don’t have a point.
Of course they’re going to cover it, the only thing more important than the DNC and race is themselves.
But if they’re supposed to be bought and paid for and in cahoots with the DNC and #FakeNews, and anti-Trump, etc. etc., that means they wouldn’t cover it.
That’s the point. I can’t believe I’m having to spell this out.
She’s the future of the dems… Cuban socialists.
But if they’re supposed to be bought and paid for and in cahoots with the DNC and #FakeNews, and anti-Trump, etc. etc., that means they wouldn’t cover it.
That’s the point. I can’t believe I’m having to spell this out.
That’s not my point and I started the thread. Why are you trying to deflect?
Oh, so you’re the poster police now?
You started a thread and made your point I commented to inform you that you made an additional point that you didn’t intend to make. No one can force you to respond if that rustles your jimmies.
It should please you that the #FakeNews media is covering politicians consistently. Trump declares war on press? They cover it. Progressive declares war on press? They cover it.
PS: your wiki is open.
Trump has not done anything to the press but tell the truth about them. Unlike Obama.
Obama is cool.
Obama is cool.
Why? …