Unauthorized Surveillance

[JayJay]

@conan

Check the time Einstein. My post/thread came out about 2 hours before our host came on live.

OK- my bad- from his social media.

I’m sure it was on Rush too.

And Barr of course gave precisely zero evidence for his assertion that “spying occurred”, of course.

So my guess is this will be as much as a “nothingberder” as it ever has been.

[conan]

Stop with your insults.

[JayJay]

@wiley8425

When you have to keep changing the narrative to support your claims…

One minute he’s a petulant man-child who can’t take even the slightest criticism. Next he’s got stones and accusations of obstruction won’t deter him. Make up your mind.

There’s no conflict in the two opinions.

[wiley8425]

Sure. Water is also dry. Up is down. Black is white. You bet.

[NebraskaFootball]

@reflechissez

@DougBH

@reflechissez

@conan

Graham talking to Barr asking why Trump was never advised about the Russian involvement.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=9&v=SYBIzDtNVwc

Except he was advised.

As I recall, in general yes. In specific, as the names of people who were suspected of connections with Russia, no. You can’t really do much if you don’t have the specifics. What, go back to the McCarthy era where everyone is suspected of being a Russian spy?

That is such ■■■■■■■■■ trump was warned that Russia was/might be trying to influence his campaign. With no other details, one might want to be mindful of Russians trying to influence your campaign. Instead, the trump swamp embraced the Russians.

And instead of acting traitorous and unethical, every single person on his campaign should have notified the authorities every time someone from Russia reached out to them and wanted to communicate. Even if their actions did not rise to the level of being able to prove criminal beyond a reasonable doubt in a US court of law, which is a massively high burden, what they DID do, that we know of from public reporting, was reprehensible.

But we have some Americans who would rather see American Law Enforcement Institutions burned to the ground, while giving a pass to our greatest hostile foreign adversary. Welcome to Trump’s version of America. We deserve this, and history is going to be brutal to these people.

[NebraskaFootball]

@DougBH

@reflechissez

@DougBH

@reflechissez

@conan

Graham talking to Barr asking why Trump was never advised about the Russian involvement.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=9&v=SYBIzDtNVwc

Except he was advised.

As I recall, in general yes. In specific, as the names of people who were suspected of connections with Russia, no. You can’t really do much if you don’t have the specifics. What, go back to the McCarthy era where everyone is suspected of being a Russian spy?

That is such ■■■■■■■■■ trump was warned that Russia was/might be trying to influence his campaign. With no other details, one might want to be mindful of Russians trying to influence your campaign. Instead, the trump swamp embraced the Russians.

No Collusion.

Yes, there was collusion. We know about plenty of it. You’re hanging your hat on there not being enough evidence to secure a guilty verdict beyond a reasonable doubt in court. It’s okay. We see where your loyalty lies.

[conan]

No…they burned themselves.

[conan]

This thread isn’t about the great hoaxes “Russian Collusion”. There is hundreds of thread about it on this forum…go revive one of them.

[conan]

Seems like democrats are lashing out against Barr for doing his job…and thus trying to intimidate Barr into silence.

@conan

Specially with Barr if Barr goes through with this.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., added in a statement that Barr “should not casually suggest that those under his purview engaged in ‘spying’ on a political campaign.”

Yet he has no problem of throwing out that Trump was colluding with Russians without a single shred of evidence. Too funny.

And Adam Schiff…that clown gives clowns a bad name.

[DougBH]

@dantes

Then why is he commenting on an ongoing investigation if not to just whip up a frenzy?

Wasn’t he called to testify by Congress?

[DougBH]

@PizzaReverend

@DougBH

@dantes

I see Barr has successfully whipped up the proletariat into a frenzy. This will be a fun few years.

Don’t rush things. Investigations take time. Look at Benghazi.

Ah yes, look at the poster boy for stupid political witch hunts that produce nothing, Benghazi.

Fake news., After the initial period I was never for continuing that review, basically because nobody cared.

[conan]

He was suppose to bow down to democrats and tell em what they want to hear.

[DougBH]

@dantes

I was under the impression the IG had been working on this issue for some months.

In other words, it was being handled in an appropriate fashion.

Apparently not a problem. Manafort was already being investigated by the FBI for tax fraud when Mueller took over the case…his one big success.

[DougBH]

@wiley8425

Forthcoming accusations of obstruction by leftists such as yourself. But you knew that already.

They want to stop the investigation. Say, are they wanting obstruction?

[DougBH]

@dantes

We must see this through to the conclusion which we have already determined!

But the Mueller report didn’t do that after all, did it?

[DougBH]

@NebraskaFootball

@DougBH

@Oryx

Why has Trump waited 2+ years to get these investigations rolling? What’s the delay?

Any attempt to do so while the Mueller report was still out would have been met with cries of trying to intimidate investigating agencies in relation to this investigation, and decried by Democrats as obstruction of justice.

Meh…investigate away. And when nothing comes out of it you guys will get another feather in your Deep State victimization hat to carry on about. Conspiracy theories can never fail, they can only be failed.

Yeah. We’ll claim the redactions in the report is where the proof of real guilt is.

[DougBH]

With the rule of law and not condemning without proof.

[Kelby]

@NebraskaFootball

@reflechissez

@DougBH

@reflechissez

@conan

Graham talking to Barr asking why Trump was never advised about the Russian involvement.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=9&v=SYBIzDtNVwc

Except he was advised.

As I recall, in general yes. In specific, as the names of people who were suspected of connections with Russia, no. You can’t really do much if you don’t have the specifics. What, go back to the McCarthy era where everyone is suspected of being a Russian spy?

That is such ■■■■■■■■■ trump was warned that Russia was/might be trying to influence his campaign. With no other details, one might want to be mindful of Russians trying to influence your campaign. Instead, the trump swamp embraced the Russians.

And instead of acting traitorous and unethical, every single person on his campaign should have notified the authorities every time someone from Russia reached out to them and wanted to communicate. Even if their actions did not rise to the level of being able to prove criminal beyond a reasonable doubt in a US court of law, which is a massively high burden, what they DID do, that we know of from public reporting, was reprehensible.

But we have some Americans who would rather see American Law Enforcement Institutions burned to the ground, while giving a pass to our greatest hostile foreign adversary. Welcome to Trump’s version of America. We deserve this, and history is going to be brutal to these people.

[DougBH]

Yeah. They should have called up McCabe, Strzok and Brennan to handle reports of Hillary acting illegally.

You do get the joke, right?

[lessright]

That and connecting Manafort to the passing of confidential polling data to a Russian during the campaign.