I’ve seen the real Tulsi pictures and she is way too attractive to be a dem.
Dems normally look like maxine waters, clinton, or pelosi.
I always love when guys go for the low road. But that’s ok. I’m used to Trumpists treating women like meat.
Ya no joke, we keep hearing about global warming but don’t what we really have is a population problem? We see the growth exploding in the third world (Bernie Got In Trouble For Bringing This Up) where the majority of these emissions occurs.
As most know China and India alone two of the biggest carbon emitters, house nearly 40% of the worlds population. Nigeria’s population is set to double in 10 years thats 400 million people. What if half of the people in the third world disappeared, global warming would also disappear.
Factual is low road? Who knew? 
Opinion is fact? No wonder the GOP has gone to ■■■■■
It is beyond dispute that dems like Waters, Clinton, and Peolsi are butt ugly.
Opinion noted.
No opinion just facts. Kind of a tradition in your party to avoid attractive women pols which is why Tulsi does not fit in.
The GOP’s only answer to climate change. Genocide. But only those icky 3rd world ■■■■ holes
You think selecting politicians based on superficial qualities is a good thing? Really?
It wouldn’t matter. Climate change is a natural thing which goes in cycles.
Natural cycles.
1 Like
There are no qualities superficial or otherwise to the “ladies” i mentioned.
Style over substance
Perfect demonsration of the qualities conservatives seek in their female politicians.
What’s even funnier is that they think it’s perfectly ok to boil down women to their degree of attractiveness. Hell, one poster on this board has openly said that women don’t belong in politics and should be in the kitchen, so there you go.
2 Likes
Butt ugly and evil as well.
What are those “qualities” we are supposed to see in the “ladies” (waters, clinton, pelosi) i mentioned?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Well technically I was referring to like a one child rule or condoms but genocide would work. I am not advocating genocide as those regions have a way of doing that themselves.
Of course I am being sarcastic, but when speaking of global warming people cannot ignore the dramatic increase in population. Simple math more people equals more emissions. So shouldn’t exploding overpopulation be in the discussion. Sanders brought this up.
Half of a country’s population does not “disappear” through the use of condoms or one child policies. (which coincidentally conservatives also oppose)
Wrong speak? Or one could address the underlining problem? Because criticizing wrong speak solves jack and ■■■■■
This is straight from the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information).
“About 90 million people are added to the worlds population every twelve months. Out of every 100 people added to this planet, 97 are born in the Third World.
If one doesn’t see a problem here they are blindly-ignorantly ignoring the problem out of fear of PC wrong speak.
Getting beyond the icky third world hyperbole it turns out mass genocide is the only meaningful solution to man made climate change…such as it may be.
And pictures of Republican woman congress people are usually just empty chairs.
There ain’t many.
A whole 13 of the 435
Wow.
Allan
1 Like
