Do you consider yourself an intellectual?
Is that her?
She looks pretty healthy to me.
Yep. She rocks.
Don’t know how old she is here but here is a link of her surfing.
I’ll never get used to that black beret.
Buffaloed.
You would think she would be uno choice #1 for the democratic party
Woman of color
Young
Military Veteran
Good orator
Want’s less military interventionism
Able to get support from a base outside of the democratic party
A populist candidate during a period when populism has been on the rise with the rejection of the establishment
Nope throw her under the bus. 
and go with the Hillary 2.0 establishment career politician kid sniffing finger nibbler.
4 Likes
Normally the #1 choice for a party is a candidate that shares the ideals of the party’s base
What issue am I am missing on her home page she lists the issues she is running on it seems to be lock step on what is or at least was important issues to the democratic party.
End regime change wars
End the new Cold War and nuclear arms race
Invest in the needs of the American people
Guarantee quality healthcare for all
Build a green economy for the 21st century
Protect the environment
Care for our veterans
Protect our civil liberties
Protect the Second Amendment while ensuring gun safety
Protect our democracy
End the failed war on drugs
Reform our broken immigration system
Protect Social Security
Protect a woman’s right to choose
End the corruption in Washington
Fix our broken criminal justice system
Equality for all
I honestly am not understanding what ideas are in that list that is not within the democratic party. Don’t get me wrong she is rather vague on details as are many of the candidates but I am not seeing issues she is running on that would make her a pariah to her on party.
In ways it reminds me of Ron Paul in 2008 and 2012 he was preaching conservatism/fiscal responsibility and people in the party were looking at him as a tin foil wearing Alex Jones reject.
2 Likes
She should have run as a republican.
1 Like
[quote=“biggestal99, post:401, topic:216371”]
To me it’s anti-intellectualism v intellectualism.
[/quote
And let me guess, you think Pelosi, Sieve, Humpty Dumpty, AOC, and co are the intellectuals. 
1 Like
I subscribe to intellectualism over anti-intellectualism.
So the answer is yes.
Allan
Don’t know who you are referring to with Seive and Humpty Dumpty but yes Pelosi and AOC
Are part of intellectualism.
Lol. Ever here of climate change?
Allan
“Subscribing” to Sports Illustrated doesn’t make you Tom Brady.
1 Like
Kind of like how yall keep wrongly posting pictures of someone other than Tulsi.
That’s Padma Lakshmi.
5 Likes
absolutely hilarious!!!
Point stands
However it does make me better equipped to comment about his performace on the football field.
Allan
