No it doesn’t.
“Always” is simply incorrect. No need for you to apologize, just correct your history
1 Like
Monty Python Argument sketch reply.
6 Likes
More seriously. To quote the First Amendment
“Congress shall make no law respecting… the right of the people peaceably to assemble…”
Now I am proposing “the people” only applies to US citizens. You might be arguing that the framers intended to grant equal rights to illegal aliens, but I disagree with you there.
But the Constitution makes it clear that people have rights
2 Likes
Whoever was giving the briefing should have said…“No cameras!” and taken the phone away from him.
1 Like
And he’s supposed to just take your word for that?
Our Favorite President, He! 
2 Likes
Thanks for stopping by with the technically legal defense.
6 Likes
Yep. And they decided that with advisors and didn’t tweet ■■■■ they saw or out intel in meetings. Even though technically they’re legally allowed to.
1 Like
Or Hillary. Trump heads would have gone through the roof.
I can imagine us intelligence services will start withholding stuff from him
Yeah, yeah…like Saddam is about to use WMDs or that a dossier…proves Russian collusion…amirite?
Maybe not that but perhaps other important things. It is not like this does not have potential ramifications that are damaging to US interests when cooperating with allies.
Do you have any confidence that he asked for a briefing on the acceptability of releasing that pic? Cause I would hope the president asks if there are any ramifications about releasing classified info before doing it. Wouldn’t you?
Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Strozk, McCabe, Ohr and others at the top level of their respective agencies…have all done serious damage, to the credibility of the offices they represented and until they are held accountable, I have a very bitter opinion towards their “expertise”.
1 Like
This isn’t the first time that a leak by the President over classified material has come up and reportedly made foreign allies question their intelligence sharing a the the US. Undermining that trust has potential implications, no? That would be concerning no matter who is in office. Seemingly glibly revealing protected secrets of our national security apparatus is worrisome. One can argue how serious it is in this instance, but it raises the question of where the line exists and under which circumstances for at least this President.
1 Like
That’s ok though because they worked for the “annointed one” and they had a D by their names.
1 Like
Nice FYI
Iranian rocket failure, Whoopi
It’s not like allies would have to fear that sharing sensitive information with the Trump administration means he might accidentally leak it later, right?
Right?
Trump to the intelligence community
6 Likes
