then you’ll have no problem linking to his senate confirmation
2 Likes
unlawful appointments are moot. he has never been anything but a civilian
1 Like
completely lawful to appoint special prosecutors.
what are you talking about?
Allan
completely lawful to appoint those who have been confirmed by the senate. not so much random civilians
1 Like
That’s not a disqualification for any job in DC.
1 Like
He was “special” all right. 
its good to know federal regulations when appointing a special prosecutor
Ҥ 600.1 Grounds for appointing a Special Counsel.
The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and—
(a) That investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a United States Attorney’s Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and
(b) That under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter.”
Allan
its also good to know the statute has expired and regulations are not backed by any law.
1 Like
its federal regulations that are completely up to date.
Displaying title 28, up to date as of 1/14/2025. Title 28 was last amended 1/08/2025.
Allan
WW
did what was required of him. investigated an alleged crime and brought indictments when appropriate.
Allan
no. the statute authorizing the AG to appoint SP’s has been expired for a long time. Title 28 does not cover it.
but he may not appoint anyone that would require Senate Confirmation which a special prosecutor would.
you know this, but your TDS will not let you know this
1 Like
Since when has that been a disqualifier for the liberals/dem party?
Glass houses dear and your side’s house already has lost many of it’s glass panes.
1 Like
lots of laughs. judge chutkan was ready to try trump on the election charges, until he appealed on presidential immunity NOT an illegally appointed SP to SCOTUS.
Allan
That’s correct. He was a hitman doing what he was hired to do.
which would have all been meaningless.
indicting a perp. and wanting to bring that person to trial is another way of looking at it though non partisan eyes.
Allan
Smith was the perfect selection for Garland. He had won a conviction against the Republican governor of Virginia by applying a law that the Supreme Court unanimously said wasn’t even relevant. But the Biden administration needed a conviction or at least an indictment before the election. It didn’t matter if the case was reversed after the election.
But the overkill of cases, all brought by Democrats, to prevent Trump from winning, became too obvious and failed in their purpose.
3 Likes
