Trump trial thread

That presumes that he is planning on sentencing him to jail time which i doubt.

1 Like

It is definitely an issue.

The lack of media cover is also a tell.

1 Like

Incorrectly based on whose say so?

It’s all over the media that his attorneys filed it.

Your duckduckgo is broken

matters not a whit. There will be no sentencing until all arguments are settled. Merchin may be a partisan hack judge, but he’s not a complete idiot.

The REACTION is. The details not so much IMO.

This is why Biden transformed into Cheato Joe and gave his little take on the ruling.

It makes his 50 million ad buy on calling Trump felon invalid.

Again IMO.

:innocent:

1 Like

I am a little less sure of the complete idiot part.

Smart was to never lay a glove on that hot potato.

tru dat.

1 Like

Yeah good luck.

What evidence came from an official act as president?

The part where he, his fixer lawyer, and a tabloid mogul conspired to kill stories (via in-kind campaign contributions). The mogul took a plea deal for non-prosecution and the fixer lawyer was convicted of campaign fraud in federal court.

This was all of course prior to the election and being in office.

The “Official Act” part becomes that when Trump was President, fraudulent invoices were supplied by the fixer lawyer, to then generate fraudulent checks for services not performed under a retainer that didn’t exist and the payments were hopefully buried in the individuals private business entity.

So technically Trump may not have committed a provable crime before assuming office, but since Trump was President at the time those private business records were feloniously falsified, those acts are somehow “official acts”.

Hope that helps.

WW

1 Like

If the President does it… it’s official.

1 Like

Some say his is the most official that ever officialed

2 Likes

might help the TDS afflicted justify thier TDS, but it does nothing to answer the question. We’ll know what evidence it is when the motion is filed. We do know that the defence did move to exclude evidence based on it in pretrial motions, and Merchen denied it.

2 Likes

If bitter beer face was a post.

:rofl:

1 Like

That poster knows the games over.

:rofl:

1 Like

The hope is dead

1 Like

I guess we will just look at the NDA Harris husband had the nanny sign instead.

Pollak: 3 Crucial Questions About the Doug Emhoff Story https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/05/pollak-3-crucial-questions-about-the-doug-emhoff-story/

As to Breitbart’s third question: why is the media ignoring this: here is The NY Times article on the matter.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/03/us/politics/doug-emhoff-affair.html?searchResultPosition=1

I hope that the House is called back into session so James Comer and Jim Jordan can hold hearings on this and get to the bottom of the matter. The whole Emhoff crime family awaits exposure.

For my part, I promise to not vote for Doug Emhoff or any other candidate who cannot be faithful to their spouse. Are you willing to make the same pledge?

you seem confused. The comment wasn’t about an affair. It was about an NDA possibly being paid and whether it was reported as a campaign contribution.

1 Like