Try reading it again.
I think you should read it again. Or, as become pretty obvious, for the first time.
The government countered with a new regulation. Tags now had to have the do-not-remove warning, and federal regulations made it unlawful to “remove or mutilate, or cause or participate in the removal or mutilation of, prior to the time any textile fiber product is sold and delivered to the ultimate consumer, any stamp, tag, label, or other identification required” on them. “Any person violating this section,” the regulation continues, “shall be guilty of an unfair method of competition, and an unfair or deceptive act or practice, under the Federal Trade Commission Act.”
The move deterred dishonest mattress dealers, but also confused more than a few consumers, who dutifully left the tags on for fear of prosecution. In recent years, the feds and many state governments have eased the minds of law-abiding citizens by amending the mattress laws so the tags read “this tag shall not be removed except by the consumer.”
So, go ahead, tear that sucker off and sleep easy.
Now the question is, do any of you understand past, present, and future tenses?
Just when you thought it couldn’t get more embarrassing…
Kushner had two long interviews with Mueller who then cleared him for his security clearance.
Oh ya? Mueller cleared him for his security clearance eh?
Go ahead and link to Mueller doing that.
So if I am personally critical of the president I cant’ agree with anything he does during his entire tenure in office?
Is that the standard now?
That’s quite the mandate Mueller has, to be approving security clearances…
Wildrose’s nit just got picked.
1 Like
no the standard is that while labeling yourself in the old forum as Trumps biggest critic…the simple fact is you are not, not by a long shot. long time reader and posters know that.
1 Like
That doesn’t say anything close to what you alleged.
That doesn’t say what you said and you know it.
See that comma in that headline you put there? Ya. That’s an important comma. The story makes it clear why
It’s Ok Rose, I know you meant Kushner had his interviews with Mueller and then later, separately, he was given his security clearance. Not that Mueller gave him his security clearance. I also know that you love to jump on posts that are as worded improperly as yours.
My personal criticisms of Trump have not changed.
When I agree with a president on a policy decision it is completely separate from my personal view of them.
Are you unable to make such distinctions in your own life?
Lowell, Kushner’s attorney, told NBC News that Kushner’s permanent security clearance “went through the normal process.”
Knowing full well that Mueller is not the normal process, do you now quadruple down or self reflect?
It says exactly what I posted, I quoted it word for word.
Is there something in the language you find difficult to understand?
The government countered with a new regulation. Tags now had to have the do-not-remove warning, and federal regulations made it unlawful to “remove or mutilate, or cause or participate in the removal or mutilation of, prior to the time any textile fiber product is sold and delivered to the ultimate consumer, any stamp, tag, label, or other identification required” on them. “Any person violating this section,” the regulation continues, “shall be guilty of an unfair method of competition, and an unfair or deceptive act or practice, under the Federal Trade Commission Act.”
Which could not have been approved if Mueller had found any “collusion” with the Russians.
It literally does not
You said the wrong thing. Now you’re freaking out because you’re impossibly incorrigible
you agree with a policy in which a felon, who pleaded guilty(not was found guilty by jury of peers) of illegal straw donations gets a full pardon without having gone through the normal pardoning process (which is not a requirement but has been established norms) and compare his actions to someone ripping a mattress tag.
yeah i can make a distinction with lots of things and none of em require me to be boot licking hypocrite.
1 Like
