Are you even capable of giving a straight answer?
in most cases
All of them. It was a stupid statement.
all of them were a random whim?
Umm no, it came up in a “routine audit”.
from D'Souza enters guilty plea - POLITICO
Cruz and three other senators, Mike Lee of Utah, Chuck Grassley of Iowa, and Jeff Sessions of Alabama, also sent FBI Director James Comey a letter in February seeking more information about prosecutors’ claims that D’Souza’s case arose from a routine FBI review of FEC filings, which show refunds and re-allocations of contributions to Long’s unsuccessful bid.
Except when you are choking on your own hypocrisy?
Great job Mr. President…and also get Blago outta prison, I always felt he was thrown to the wolfs for talking stuff.
Never took one penny from anybody.
From my lips to Trump’s ears…maybe…
Hey…I was on the right track.
no hypocrisy here Mr trump critic.
You are choking on it.
Was Obama endorsing those crimes or not with his pardons, it’s a simple yes or no answer.
Stop dude.
in the cases where they were dealing or using drugs? sure. in the cases where they had a gun crime associated with drug use, probably.
Nice try but that’s insane.
statement (original) was worded poorly and stupidly but the idea behind the statement i can understand
It’s only “illegal” if you tear the tag from a mattress you don’t own (like in a store). I’ve personally never done that…have you?
No, have you?
No-the only time I’ve been questioned by a LEO was after having been pulled over, a couple of times for speeding tickets, and once because I had forgotten to renew my registration. There was really no way for me to have been dishonest with them I knew why I had been pulled over each time (except for the registration, which I don’t think is why he pulled me over).
I mean, if these are your comparisons to the felony D’Souza committed, then it’s hard to take you terribly seriously. Your response is just asinine.
so maybe i took the defense of the comment at bit far. opps my bad
your turn.
Thank You for finally admitting it, sort of.
Pardons don’t give any form of endorsement to the crime committed, they are issued based on the President’s feelings on the original case and whether or not they think they person deserves it. No more, no less.
and still no comment on the mattress Tags, the fact that it was a felony not a misdemeanor, or he pleaded guilty and was not unfairly railroaded. even though i gave you a perfect opportunity.
I’ve commented extensively on all of them. Try reading.
I am reading the documents from the case right now, and have found no mention of this “routine audit”.
The documents are here, if you would like to see for yourself:
1 Like
commented and still wont admit fault. par for course.
