He also pardoned quite a few drug dealers, including meth. He must be ok with drug dealing.
One convicted felons testimony to a private conversation does not translate to “dead to rights”.
DiBlasio was not even charged, let alone convicted. D’Souza plead guilty.
So @WildRose are you finally admitting you were completely and absolutely, incontrovertibly wrong about your claim regarding the legality of consumers removing tags off of mattresses? 
like i told rose. did he decide on his own or did he picked from those who went through the DOJ pardon process?
Goalpost Move achieved.
Answer the damned question if you can?
Was he giving those crimes his approval or was he not?
holding my breath ;p
1 Like
What difference does it make? Who is the Final Arbiter?
Rampant Hypocrisy on display.
And? Doesn’t mean he wasn’t singled out for prosecution for political reasons.
not goalpost very relevant.
That’s a felony with a minimum mandatory.
arbiter was Obama who agreed with recommendation.
this case the arbiter was trump who decided on his own
What difference does that make? Was obama saying those crimes were ok?
Hopefully that Trump pardon pen is chalked full of ink then!!
Obama pardons meth and cocaine dealers, no big deal, Trump pardons a guy who gave a little too much to a campaign, hair on fire run for your lives.
What evidence do you have that suggests he was “singled out”?
He was reported to the FEC by the candidate he donated to, and plead guilty.
Why shouldn’t he have been prosecuted?
He has a pen and a phone and he’s not afraid to use them.
1 Like
find me someone Obama Pardoned on a whim and we can compared apples to apples and in that case i would agree that Obama would consider those crimes OK
Well played sir.
