He’s made a lot of lawsuit threats that have been nothing but bluster. Regardless of the fact this is a nuisance suit, I’d be surprised if he goes through it. It’s just another show by the circus clown.
I agree with Doug. This is nothing but the continual “Welcome my friends to the show that never ends” circus that has been the Trump admin. since day one. He has no legitimate legal grounds to sue CNN.
TheDoctorIsIn:So, you’re saying frivolous lawsuits and threats of such are now fair game in political campaigns?
Good to know.
This is the third post that completely misrepresented what I said. Go read it again.
Whenever a post starts out “So, you’re saying…” the chances are 99% that what follows is not what the person was saying.
ha so true.
it’s a way they craft a narrative that fits their argument
DougBH:And for numerous reasons concluded nothing illegal there.
Why do you keep repeating this? By this point, even you know that this is not true.
what was illegal?
prove to everyone you have no answer by not answering
as usual
Yep. A fact that Mueller looked into, didn’t he? And for numerous reasons concluded nothing illegal there.
IMO, the fact that the Russians would have to go through such a contorted process to meet with Don Junior is proof enough there was no system of communication set up the way some (Steele) liked to say. Why would that have met through that guy in Britain?
I disagree that the Mueller Report completely absolved the president. It did not. Bill Barr may have given the country that impression and the conclusion of the report soft-pedaled what happened but he wasn’t absolved by any stretch. The findings show a lot of things that showed the Trump campaign was incredibly crooked, just like his presidency has been.
DougBH:Yep. A fact that Mueller looked into, didn’t he? And for numerous reasons concluded nothing illegal there.
IMO, the fact that the Russians would have to go through such a contorted process to meet with Don Junior is proof enough there was no system of communication set up the way some (Steele) liked to say. Why would that have met through that guy in Britain?
I disagree that the Mueller Report completely absolved the president. It did not. Bill Barr may have given the country that impression and the conclusion of the report soft-pedaled what happened but he wasn’t absolved by any stretch. The findings show a lot of things that showed the Trump campaign was incredibly crooked, just like his presidency has been.
no it didn’t
you can quit pretending it says something it doesnt
(cnn is already doing that for you)
NuffSaid: thinkingman:people see now how pathetic and leftist CNN is and how the last thing they care about is truth.
same for their demented little stepsister msnbc
So, can I put you down for being FOR 1st amendment or AGAINST 1st amendment?
there’s no attack on first amendment
sorry i see through the babified media crybaby narrative
So you think Trumps potential lawsuit is bogus because CNN can broadcast whatever bias they want.
Glad you agree with Americans who appreciate 1st amendment.
thinkingman: NuffSaid: thinkingman:people see now how pathetic and leftist CNN is and how the last thing they care about is truth.
same for their demented little stepsister msnbc
So, can I put you down for being FOR 1st amendment or AGAINST 1st amendment?
there’s no attack on first amendment
sorry i see through the babified media crybaby narrative
So you think Trumps potential lawsuit is bogus because CNN can broadcast whatever bias they want.
Glad you agree with Americans who appreciate 1st amendment.
“here’s what you are saying even though your words have nothing contextually to do with that”
thinkingman: madasheck: thinkingman: madasheck: DougBH:Yep. A fact that Mueller looked into, didn’t he? And for numerous reasons concluded nothing illegal there.
IMO, the fact that the Russians would have to go through such a contorted process to meet with Don Junior is proof enough there was no system of communication set up the way some (Steele) liked to say. Why would that have met through that guy in Britain?
I disagree that the Mueller Report completely absolved the president. It did not. Bill Barr may have given the country that impression and the conclusion of the report soft-pedaled what happened but he wasn’t absolved by any stretch. The findings show a lot of things that showed the Trump campaign was incredibly crooked, just like his presidency has been.
no it didn’t
you can quit pretending it says something it doesnt
(cnn is already doing that for you)
Your interpretation of what I said is fake news. You might want to re-read it and then think about it this time. I look forward to your response based on that, not some gobbledygook you heard on the radio.
“gobbledygook”
lol
if there’s a crime post it
if not join the staff at msnbc. (if you havent already)
A nothing answer. Did that take a lot of thinking? So you can’t reply substantively to my comments about this useless suit? (Here, I’m even giving you some help…)
you didnt ask a legitimate question so stop expecting an “answer”
it’s a way they craft a narrative that fits their argument
Can’t speak for everyone but when I say it, it’s because I’m trying to get them to clarify what they’ve said because it’s ambiguous, or just plain unclear.
President Trump’s legal team sent a letter to CNN, threatening to sue because of overt bias and negative reporting of the President.
I, for one, am all for 1st Amendment. People wanna be high-profile, then they need to accept that there will be negative press about them. It doesn’t matter the percentage of good press versus bad press.
Thoughts?
Just red meat for the jackals.
Too bad it won’t ever materialize
thinkingman:it’s a way they craft a narrative that fits their argument
Can’t speak for everyone but when I say it, it’s because I’m trying to get them to clarify what they’ve said because it’s ambiguous, or just plain unclear.
well good luck ma’ friend. because they don’t like the glaring light of truth shined in their little beady red leftist eyes
thinkingman: NuffSaid: thinkingman: NuffSaid: thinkingman:people see now how pathetic and leftist CNN is and how the last thing they care about is truth.
same for their demented little stepsister msnbc
So, can I put you down for being FOR 1st amendment or AGAINST 1st amendment?
there’s no attack on first amendment
sorry i see through the babified media crybaby narrative
So you think Trumps potential lawsuit is bogus because CNN can broadcast whatever bias they want.
Glad you agree with Americans who appreciate 1st amendment.
“here’s what you are saying even though your words have nothing contextually to do with that”
Ah, so you are in the camp that squashing the 1st amendment is ok as long as The Chosen One can shut down opposing views.
Kim Jung Un appreciates the sentiment.
there is no quashing if the first amendment
for the love of Gaia, please see what is really what
I could envisage some very interesting questions that could be put to D Trump under oath. Do you think that D Trump would have read QB VII by Leon Uris?
Lying comes as naturally to Donald as breathing. I can’t imagine being under oath would have any power to render him truthful.
Lying comes as naturally to Donald as breathing. I can’t imagine being under oath would have any power to render him truthful.
I donno, historically, Deposition Donny seems to be a whole different character from Donald Trump.
there is no quashing if the first amendment
for the love of Gaia, please see what is really what
Lets get you on record.
Will he go through with it? Yes or no.
Do you support it? Yes or no.
thinkingman:there is no quashing if the first amendment
for the love of Gaia, please see what is really what
Lets get you on record.
Will he go through with it? Yes or no.
Do you support it? Yes or no.
ah ok… finally a straightforward question about it
um, i dunno. he might. i doubt it. it’s not worth the fight in my opinion. but i can certainly see why he did this. any amount of attention drawn to how non-journalistic and grossly opinionated and biased org they are is warranted. this has been my opinion since the mid 1980’s when this was clear. and in that generation there were still some people who actually revered “news.”
i dont support this really as i see it as futile. the knee jerk leftist media mob will demagogue it to death as they do every aspect of American life.
@NuffSaid Just to clarify: are you referring to Donald Trump as "The Chosen One’ or is it your selection in today’s Caulfield Cup over 2,400 metres?
thinkingman:um, i dunno
Thinkingman.
yes? go ahead…