What’s wrong with this? He was “asked” to do his duty.
That’s why they are called alleged criminal acts.
They are alleged criminal acts as outlined in indictment
This is one of the silliest exchanges i ever had on this board

Pence yesterday: “But let’s be clear on this point. It wasn’t just that he asked for a pause. The president specifically asked me and his gaggle of crackpot lawyers asked me to literally reject votes, which would have resulted in the issue being turned over to the House of Representatives."
Pence knew that it could have been turned over to the House of Representatives and he would have done his duty. He caved.
At least you’ve finally admitted what Trump’s goal was - to throw out the legally state-certified votes of the people and have the House declare him the winner.
Yay for We The People. Yay for Democracy.

mobiusptc:
The president specifically asked me and his gaggle of crackpot lawyers asked me to literally reject votes
What’s wrong with this? He was “asked” to do his duty.
Are you specifically and willfully refusing to read entire sentences?
Do you agree the VP has the power to overturn the election, do you believe the VP has the right to reject the votes of 150 million American?
YES or NO?

What’s wrong with this? He was “asked” to do his duty.
Yes the founders definitely intended for the vice president to be able to just ignore elections if they felt like it. It’s not like the system was originally set up so the loser of the last election became VP and would have every reason to just do it if his side didn’t win and the people that wrote the constitution were extremely concerned about abuses of power to overthrow the democracy they were creating.

That’s why they are called alleged criminal acts.
I think alleging a crime was the only way Jack could charge Donald Trump in Federal Court.

do you believe the VP has the right to reject the votes of 150 million American?
This is the most ignorant question I can remember ever seeing on this forum.

FreeAndClear:
That’s why they are called alleged criminal acts.
I think alleging a crime was the only way Jack could charge Donald Trump in Federal Court.
Every crime charged in every single local, state, federal courthouse by every single state local and federal prosecutor is alleged. Bar none…

Yes the founders definitely intended for the vice president to be able to just ignore elections if they felt like it. It’s not like the system was originally set up so the loser of the last election became VP and would have every reason to just do it if his side didn’t win and the people that wrote the constitution were extremely concerned about abuses of power to overthrow the democracy they were creating.
As far as I know, the founders did not give the Vice President a role in federal elections.

mobiusptc:
do you believe the VP has the right to reject the votes of 150 million American?
This is the most ignorant question I can remember ever seeing on this forum.
It’s only an ignorant question if you do not know the answer.
Do you know the answer?

In the last two days, he has given multiple interview defending Trump. This is what I mean. Even slavish devotion to Trump isn’t enough for y’all to just pretend like it’s not happening because you hate him for whatever dumb reason.
LOL I missed those, could you post a few?

Do you know the answer?
You expect an answer to a stupid question, ask somebody else.

As far as I know, the founders did not give the Vice President a role in federal elections.

The presidential election is a Federal Election. It’s not an election until it is certified by Congress. This should not even be questioned.
Sure.

Every crime charged in every single local, state, federal courthouse by every single state local and federal prosecutor is alleged. Bar none…
Sheeewwwww!!!
What they were trying to charge Donald J Trump with is not and never was a crime.

mobiusptc:
Do you know the answer?
You expect an answer to a stupid question, ask somebody else.
That question is at the very heart of Jan 6. Its at the very heart of the indictment and the very very core of Trump post election legal strategy.
Why can’t you answer ?

That question is at the very heart of Jan 6. Its at the very heart of the indictment and the very very core of Trump post election legal strategy.
Why can’t you answer ?
Some on here have tried to get you to see how stupid the question is. I couldn’t do any better than they have.

LOL I missed those, could you post a few?
No thanks. You’d just refuse to acknowledge it. Why don’t you take ten seconds to Google it?

mobiusptc:
Every crime charged in every single local, state, federal courthouse by every single state local and federal prosecutor is alleged. Bar none…
Sheeewwwww!!!
What they were trying to charge Donald J Trump with is not and never was a crime.
You know what these refer to?
Serial numbers for the paper that it is printed on

No thanks. You’d just refuse to acknowledge it. Why don’t you take ten seconds to Google it?
Why should I try to disprove it?