No. I do this thing called “reading the news”. From the buzzfeed article in the OP
“Two FBI agents with direct knowledge of the Trump Tower Moscow negotiations told BuzzFeed News earlier this year that Cohen was in frequent contact with foreign individuals about the real estate venture — and that some of these individuals had knowledge of or played a role in 2016 election meddling. The identity of those individuals remains unknown.”
This is too easy. It’s like you havent even read the buzzfeed article.
I like how you dance around the fact that the buzzfeed article said 2 FBI agents say there Kremlin officials involved in the Moscow trump tower talks who were involved with meddling the OP article is clearly reporting on the buzzfeed article. You obviously havent read it because all your claims contradict the article. You lose!
Hopefully they will pay attention to the Constitution and impeach only if a high crime or misdemeanor is found. If not, then we may enter into a new period where every time a President is elected who is of a different party than the House and Senate, he can be immediately removed for…“if they impeach”
Fortunately, that will not be the case now, as a conviction would require 2/3 of the Senate which will not convict without a “high crime or misdemeanor”.
There is no proof that the idea went any further than Cohen and Sater. Oh and please don’t insult my intelligence by pushing two unnamed sources discussing the idea with a representative of Dmitry Peskov, Putin’s press secretary as proof of anything.
The article(s) offers few facts and lots of spin. I don’t dispute the facts, only the spin. It really doesn’t come as a surprise that you can’t tell the difference between fact and spin.
the OP article is clearly reporting on the buzzfeed article. You obviously havent read it because all your claims contradict the article. You lose!
