To document that you recognize your decision will be open to scrutiny, memorialize you are aware there is a book that needs to be followed, and gasp, acknowledge your decision is on thin ice.
Iâm sorry but lawyers and powerful people literally do this every day. Judges do it every time they rule on something which they know could later be reversed because the decision is on âthin iceâ. Itâs amazing this has to be explained.
You donât get to be a person in Susan riceâs position and not make decisions that are âon thin ice.â Why do you think trump orders Rosenstein to write a memo âdocumentingâ the grounds for firing Comey? Take a wild stab at that one.
If you are doing something âby the bookâ you just do it by the book. You donât email yourself, thus establishing documentation, that you are doing it âby the bookâ.
Why is this so hard to explain?
You havenât spent much time in white collar jobs, have you?
When youâre working in politics, or law, or even just big business - you document everything - and always cover your ass. There are always people looking to take you down.
Why did trump order rosenstein to write a memo? What was up with that? Do you think trumps layers maybe recommended he do that? Iâd love to hear your take.
Five police reports. Four just go through the normal procedure. One says they intend to do the investigation âby the bookâ. I know which one I am going to look at more carefully.
I was an auditor for the DoD for 30 years. I wrote many reports, some very sensitive. Some becoming court cases. I never started out a review documenting to the world that I intended to do the investigation âby the bookâ.
Well, there you have it folks. If Doug hasnât done it, then no one should. Case closed, we can shut down this forum.
I am in a somewhat similar line of work where my job needs to document everything but hairy incidents where big decisions need to be made have to be documented in detail so that down the line, if some â â â â â â â decides to question what I did and why, itâs all right there in black and white, made at the time of incident. Not a hard concept to grasp, unless a person has partisan blinders on.
I always left a paper (or rather, in later years, electronic paper) trail of what I did. To the best of my ability it was always âby the bookâ. I just never started out an assignment literally stating that I intended to be honest or that I intended to do everything âby the bookâ. I just did it that way and let the facts speak for themselves.
I would consider starting out a review by documenting that I intended to do it âby the bookâ as a strange thing to do. Why would I even say that?
Its like starting out your week at the bank documenting that you did not intend to embezzle any money that week.
Not a hard concept to grasp and not what we are talking about. How many assignments do you start out by documenting literally saying âI intend to do this assignment honestlyâ?
Thatâs not even close to what Rice said in her email.
âPresident Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities âby the bookâ. The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.â
She documented a meeting because she knew that people like you would question it. She emailed it to herself so there was a timestamp.