But they aren’t using funds (lawful or unlawful) when they withhold funds from States who refuse to abide by their rules. They have the power to designate funds as they see fit.
you’re just wrong. don’t worry, i know you won’t admit it. the congress has no authority to pass abortion law
won’t happen either way. niether side could muster 50 votes
If I were wrong, States would have taken Federal laws regarding such things to the SCOTUS long ago.
ANY woman with a brain CAN find another way of contraception.
1 Like
What if raped? Or do you hold the opinion of that idiot former Republican congressman who claimed that in “legitimate rape” a woman’s body has ways to shut that down?
My understanding is the SC kicked the abortion issue back to the states.
If she tried to sign Roe into law then she would be attempting to federalize it again would she not?
That would fly against the SC ruling in my humble opinion.
Instead of cooling the rhetoric they are ramping it up!
Cringe Pierre just yesterday i think it was , was pouring on the Trump being a Huge threat to democracy ■■■■■■■■■
Trump is a threat to the Swamp is what he is.
1 Like
A basic issue is that government continually lies, and its accomplices in the media are profoundly uninterested in investigating official explanations no matter how bizarre.
Consider the recent report of explosives found shortly before a Trump rally:
While the official story is now that there was no incident with “explosives,” reports have confirmed that there was indeed an incident in which a citizen was training a dog to sniff explosive devices. In its frenzy to pounce on a “debunking” opportunity, the media evidently neglected to explore the bizarre circumstance that a private citizen was training a dog to sniff explosives at an event in which President Trump was scheduled to speak . . .
What on earth makes sense about a private individual training a bomb detection dog at a site where President Trump is scheduled to speak just hours later? Was there by chance a decoy bomb being used for this training? If so, did the decoy look anything like the hoax January 6 pipe bombs? Who is this mysterious individual bomb training his dog at that location? Does he perchance have an interesting travel history in Ukraine like the previous would-be assassin?
Nothing to see here move on . . .
Please … Don’t ever conflate an abortion with “contraception.”
Just stop Adam. The ignorant opinion of a small handful of radical conservatives does not represent the Republican Party. No matter where this abortion issue ends up, whether it is at the 7-week heartbeat point or the 28-week viability point, exceptions for rape, incest and the physical well-being of the woman will be part of it. To continue to ask that question serves no useful purpose other than to inflame.
1 Like
It did kick it back to the States, but it does not preclude Congress from being involved in the issue. The name Roe is being used as an identifier for yet unwritten proposed abortion legislation, but in no way can that legislation overturn Dobbs and reinstate Roe.
I am for rape and inscest to be excluded.
So it sounds like Comrade Kamala is promising something she can’t even do even if she wanted to.
Another Comrade lie is hardly surprising.
Who was funding Routh’s lavish lifestyle?
Who was keeping him out of jail?
Who gave him the gun?
https://x.com/vigilantfox/status/1836932336463593715
The fact that the FBI appears to be doing everything it can to avoid any serious investigation into these kinds of questions reeks of complicity.
1 Like
Good to know. Because your original post made it sound like only an idiot woman with no brain would get pregnant from rape. “ANY woman with a brain”
The left and their rhetoric…
2 Likes
