you mean the trial by a jury of his peers in a state that he won handily, with a judge he appointed?
2 Likes
Of course not. Itās always so unfair for Donald.
Check out Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Natāl Archives & Records Admin.
And then check out:
Judicial Watch: Clinton Sock Drawer Audio Tape Case Exonerates Pres. Trump
This indictment is nothing more than a shiny object to obscure the Obama/Biden criminal money laundering operations in which they sucked in tens of millions of dollars from foreign powers by using government influence . . .quid pro quo.
JWK
Our socialist revolutionaries are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
And this crop doesnāt even have him saying, āYou wanna take a look?ā
And he knew he was being recorded.
Oh hey. Welcome back?
1 Like
Probably not. Trump will do all he can to delay and delay
Step one: fire lawyers. 
oh look tommy appeared out of the woodwork for some reason.haha
yeah i know āsmoking gunā
like the 500 or so you ignore on your man biden
i dont blame him.
Think itās pretty obvious why.
37 count federal indictment. Federal prosecutors have like a 95% conviction rate, and thatās usually without the defendant cheerfully admitting to the crimes on tape.
ādocumentā crimes
gasp
no one commits those
Dog, you used to want newspaper reporters charged with the Espionage Act for publishing leaked information.
Now hereās your homeboy saying, āThis is a Pentagon war plan, I definitely didnāt declassify it, I just took it, would you like to take a look?ā
2 Likes
Lol thatās not what this is.
hereās pure proof that it is exactly that
knee jerk parroting. : ) thx
oh and um, LOL
did he sell/give any docs to anyone?
did he destroy any of them?
The chickens are finally coming home to roost.
1 Like
another one out of the woodwork! haha. yeahā¦. welcome back
1 Like
Is that what is on the indictment?
I posted the other day on the D-Day thread.
