Opinions seem to vary based on whether or not the speaker wants to see the target punished to the point of destruction.
Judicial theory does not apply, pardons are extra judicial processes and that power belongs solely and unquestionably to the Executive and the Exec alone under our constitution.
I realize a pardon is erasing a prior convictiion, whereas in my case the judge decided he/she was not personally guilty. But it was the only comparison I could think of that is just as ridiculous.
A judge would not preside over his/her own trial for obvious reasons. And for equally obvious reasons a President should not pardon himself.
Is it always an admission of guilt? Not in this case. One of the few pardons Trump has issued so far that was the right thing to do.
Over a century after Jack Johnson was convicted in 1913 of violating a federal law for transporting a white woman across state lines, President Donald Trump has granted the first black heavyweight boxing champion a full posthumous pardon.
Yeah, Trump and his cronies have been such helpful participants in this investigation and aren’t constantly either threatening to shut it down or bragging about how they could at a moment’s notice. Law and order!