Trump got a symbolic punch in the face today

Not Crazy Stacey Did you forget about her?

2 Likes

Ok, let me spell this out clearly for those who may have difficulty keeping up with which election we are discussing in this thread.

All parties involved have accepted the results of the 2022 GA Primary Election and are moving on to November.

Incidentally, Stacey Abrams won her primary. Why would she not accept that?

Thanks for playing though…

:roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes:

1 Like

image

1 Like

6 whole losses?

No wonder the libs are still slobbering in this thread.

:rofl:

2 Likes

They are not “libs” or “progressives”. They are Authoritarian Revolutionaries, the very kind who took over Cuba and now rule over the people with an iron fist. :wink:

JWK

In every oppressive country like communist China, socialist Cuba, North Korea, Venezuela, etc., the people are disarmed and suffer the loss of inalienable rights under an iron fisted government which lives large on the people’s labor. Forewarned is forearmed.

1 Like
1 Like

Fox News also has corporate policy on what is allowed to be said or opined on especially about the results of the 2020 election, whereas that doesn’t appear to be the corporate policy of NewsMax. FoxNews also had draconian Covid vaccine policy that they misrepresented (aka lied about) and still do. :woman_shrugging:

But I still can’t give up my daily dose of Jesse & Greg battling the whacko leftists on the panel of The Five and I love how Jesse just smacks down the resident woke wierdo’s Geraldo and Jessica, I can’t get enough of that. :smiley:

And seriously Greg Gutfeld is now the ratings king of late night for a reason and that reason is he is a very funny irreverent libertarian. He is somewhat subdued on the daytime The Five show but he lets it rip pretty good on his late night Gutfeld! show.

3 Likes

Yeah, she refused to concede.

1 Like

If it’s caught on film, it cannot be called a conspiracy. Seeing is believing to everybody but blind people.

1 Like

Did D’Souza match the cell phone data to any video?

:roll_eyes:

Are you really suggesting there were no people stuffing multiple ballots into “drop boxes”?

If we don’t secure our elections and insure only legal ballots are counted, our election process will be no better than that in Cuba, Venezuela, and other such countries. Why do you persist in suggesting there was no shenanigans in the 2020 election?

It appears to be true that “There was no widespread or significant voter fraud in the 2020 election”. The illegal voting was intentionally concentrated and limited to a few battleground states which decided the election.

JWK

Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. And that is why the Democrat Party Leadership detests federalism . . . it is an obstacle to controlling and subjugating the people completely.

1 Like

The instance that D’Souza showed of a man putting five ballots in a box was investigated and it was shown that he was dropping off the ballots of his family members which is completely legal.

1 Like

Hildawg shouldn’t have tried to suppress it.

My question was, Are you really suggesting there were no people stuffing multiple ballots into “drop boxes”?

It’s not a suggestion. It’s reality. There is nothing but innuendo, which you’ll gladly gobble up because he lost.

Maybe.

Illegally? It is possible.

Enough to swing and election?

There is no evidence of that.

He lost? My interest has nothing to do with who won or lost. It’s about having fraud free elections. Did you intentionally miss what I wrote?

If we don’t secure our elections and insure only legal ballots are counted, our election process will be no better than that in Cuba, Venezuela, and other such countries.

Well, contrary to your assertion there is no evidence of illegal voting to swing an election, there were certainly enough illegal no-excuse ballots counted in PA’s election to determine its outcome.

JWK

There was no widespread or significant voter fraud in the 2020 election”. The illegal voting was intentionally concentrated and limited to a few battleground states which decided the election.

There is no evidence of election fraud at a scale that would change the outcome.

Even under the broadest of definitions of “illegal”, it just doesn’t happen enough to affect the election.

Of course it doesn’t. That’s why in the years that you have been here and all the elections…. This is when you start caring. No reason whatsoever other than integrity mhmmm sure

1 Like