Ok that makes sense. Civil War? The conservative federalists won right?
I’m just skimming over the wiki but it’s oddly kind of similar to the Mexican Revolution in some ways, with the people who wanted a more federal structure fighting the ones who wanted it more centralized like France. Then all of Northern South America got drug into the chaos.
Their army certainly would have been battle hardened at the time fighting such a brutal conflict.
None of that is true. We were instrumental in completing the original canal, but not the updated one. Most of the shipping through it is not US owned. Our economy would suffer if it were closed but would not particularly improve if we owned it. And Jimmy Carter did not give it away, he negotiated a treaty ceding US governance of the canal zine the roots of which began with riots against the US in January, 1964, regarding Panamanian sovereignty of their own country.
The new locks are large enough (1401’x180’) to accommodate the Nimitz hull, but the deck width (252’) is too big. I don’t know of any other Naval vessels that can’t get through the locks.
Relatively few ships have been built that won’t fit in the new Panama locks. In fact, the size of the locks determines the size of vessels unless (as with the largest supertankers) they are specifically built for routes that do not go through the canal. For example, the Panamax container ships were 965’x106’ to exactly fit through the original locks. The new Panamax ships are 1200’x168’ to exactly fit through the new locks. The two largest cruise ships ever built, the Icon of the Seas and the Utopia of the Seas, can fit through the Panama Canal.