What? …
Oooo it was worse that i thought. FBI said 99% likely MULTIPLE agencies hacked the Clinton server.
Yea, its a dirty little secret.
And that “evidence” was turned over to the FBI. The FBI says there is no evidence, debunking the anonymous claims.
@adroit provided logical reasons as to why the conspiracy theory makes absolutely no sense. The glaring holes in the theory were exposed by basic logic. Something that no one has even made an attempt to rebut. Including you.
The IG report focused on the entirety of the information and evidence related to the Clinton email server investigation. Including every single aspect that dealt with people at the FBI, who according to the DC article, were the people involved allegedly with the ICIG information. And yet, the IG report makes no mention of this whatsoever. I guess Horowitz is part of the DEEEEEEP STATE. Breadcrumbs…right?
No. There is no translation needed. My words have meaning and are quite clear in their own right. I know you have a need to explain what everyone else says REALLY means. Like you did with the FBI’s response that debunked the DC story. You’re as transparent as a window.
Let’s see the transcript.
attempted to hack and hacked are completely different things.
Find it yourself. I linked the story.
And Comey excels at parsing words. Remember his judgement on Hillery’s role in servergate?
No you did not. Here is your statement…
You claimed that someone said she had been hacked, as in definitive, at least once. You have not provided anything to support this contention. So no, I’m not going on a wild goose chase to try and find something that I don’t believe happened. But if you have proof, then I will gladly entertain it and discuss it with you.
So failure of an agency to either confirm or deny a story automatically means that story isn’t true? I don’t doubt that’s who things work in a Trump hating bizarro world.
You’re alleging a massive cover up and the only one talking about is Loue Gohmert.
That’s what you want us to believe? Seriously?
No, the FBI said no such ■■■■■■■ thing. The underlying article that Breitbart links to:
Authorities are operating under the working assumption there is a high chance Hillary Clinton’s private server was breached, one source with intimate knowledge of the FBI investigation told Fox News – though there still are no digital fingerprints proving a breach.
The source said the server may have been hacked by up to five foreign intelligence agencies. While other sources believe this is probable, evidence has not emerged to confirm this.
The FBI said no such thing regarding the ICIG.
I will rectify that oversight and reply directly to the post in question.
Again, failure to mention the ICIG information by the DOJ IG doesn’t mean there was no Chinese hacking.
On that we can agree.
Truth.
This story will die, like almost all of the right-wing conspiracy nonsense does in a day or two, only to be replaced by more baloney spewed by Trump to distract us from what’s really going on.
All these little rabbit holes that lead to nowhere, but the gullible CEC base eats it up and waits for the next one, never questioning the credibility of their “news” sources, because these tidbits fill an emotional need. It doesn’t need to stand up to logic and scrutiny because that is not the purpose it serves. Just the veneer of “truthiness” is enough.
Fortunately, these fictions don’t stand up in a court of law. Whatever Mueller has, I hope he gets with the program soon.
1 Like
It doesn’t automatically say anything.
But when there’s a pattern of “throwaway” stories that seek to support a broader “narrative” of “Deep State corruption” but are never verified or disproved, even when it would be very easy to do so…or when there are logical inconsistencies which are simply glossed over, one begins to question why this pattern is developing.
To be blunt…there’s a reason Donald Trump throws out all sorts of ideas in tweet form in blitzes, or why Sean Hannity has Sara Carter on every day throwing out all sorts of “Wow…if THIS story is true…” segments.
And it’s working…
1 Like
You’re so far down the rabbit hole at this point, there is no saving you. Enjoy the conspiracy theory, and wake me up when we start to see some indictments.
But you’re trying to source Comey’s testimony in your own defense. You’re all over the map.
Yes, you did link to a story. Did you read the story?
If you had read it, you’d see Breitbart was just parroting a Fox News piece - and if you click that link, you’d see that Fox retracted their story, and “clarified” it.
1 Like
They do. I can’t even tell you of some stuff they revealed because I’m still under an NDA. But they can and they do. And you know this. So dont deflect.
The ICIG, on the other hand, would be subject to NDAs.
Exactly. The intellectually lazy have a desperate need to engage their confirmation bias, and there are outlets willing to monetize and capitalize on this reality. It is sad to see so many people so easily duped though.
