It was pointed out that I didn’t appropriately address the points you raised. I will attempt to do that now.
I believe I addressed your first point in an earlier response. To your second point, the article says nothing about the metadata being altered. The article clearly states that the metadata showed a courtesy copy was being sent to the Chinese as a result of code that was embedded on Clinton’s server.
So basically you want me to wake you up when I finally decide to see things your way. Fat chance that will happen, so enjoy your long sleep.
Nope. You’re making this up. Congress doesn’t have the authority to declassify information. Don’t you remember this song and dance about declassifying the Nunes memo?
NDAs have nothing to do with it.
I could make the same sad case against all of the Trump haters.
No. I stated quite plainly and clearly, to wake me up when we start to see some indictments from this enormous criminal conspiracy. You know, when actual evidence exists that has been presented to an actual court of law, and criminal charges are deemed appropriate due to the actual evidence supporting said charges.
Until such time, enjoy chasing your tail with the next “BIGGER THAN WATERGATE” scandal being perpetrated upon you by those making money off of your gullibility.
Are you referring to the Trump-hating Russia collusion throwaway stories. There are plenty of those floating around.
I don’t listen to Hannity so I have no clue what you are talking about.
That is exactly how the Rooskie story is being billed. You can go back to sleep now. I’ll wake you when I finally see things your way.
Okay. Let’s hear your pitch why it is sad that the majority of America disapproves of Donald Trump. An immoral, unethical, unindicted co-conspirator to a criminal conspiracy designed to illegally affect the outcome of the election in his favor. A disgusting excuse of a man that embodies the seven deadly sins. A man who is mortgaging our children’s future and blowing up the deficit and debt to record levels during a time of economic prosperity. A man who is debasing the office of the Presidency on a daily basis. A man in charge of arguably the most corrupt administration in modern times, if not in all of US history. A man who sees his administration lurch from one scandal to the next, that has resulted not only in people being found guilty in a court of law and will spend time in prison for their corruption, but additional members who have lost their jobs and had their reputations ruined due to their scandalous behavior being exposed. A man who has made us weaker on the global stage when it comes to North Korea, Russia, China and Iran. A man who has only been capable of one serious piece of legislation being passed, even when he is the head of the party that controls the whole of government.
Go ahead. Tell us all why it is sad that there are people who don’t support all of the above.
Roger Stone hearts this post and thanks you for your support.
Yes. And the FBI forensic experts were too stupid to look at the metadata.
Seriously?
It was not just the Caller’s assertion. You are being deceptive. Strzok was confronted with this in his congressional testimony and Q&A. Why lie about “Trumpers”?
Maybe stupid. But there are lots of other possible reasons. I think you libs are squirming on this one.
Gohmert isn’t exactly the most technologically sophisticated person in the world. He brought it up in a rambling barely coherent tirade with Strzok that was still rather vague, few of any specifics. The Daily Caller alleged far more specific information.
None of which is confirmed by anyone.
Oh, the conspiracy gets deeper. You guys are never shy about expanding conspiracy theories.
Why do you dissemble? No one said they declassify.
NDAs have nothing to do with it? Are you ■■■■■■■ kidding me? You must be thinking of Stormy Daniels types of NDAs.
When you get a security clearance to access intelligence info, you sign an NDA. But Congress does not need security clearances to access classified.
You must be really really nervous about this because we here have discussed how Congress is different many times. Gohmert is not going to be prosecuted for revealing classified. The ICIG people are not going to be able to publically confirm the info while it is still classified because those people DO have security clearances.
Well, you see, because I understand how emails work, in order for the headers of the email to include a CC address that wasn’t originally there, the code that the Chinese company embedded would have to alter the email message. Then, that email message would contain those altered headers and leave evidence that it was altered when delivered. It’s absolutely absurd to posit that hackers able to embed hostile code on a server would then leave glaring evidence that they compromised that server in such an amateur way. And then the ICIG would report that to the FBI as an “anomaly”.
From a technical standpoint, the assertions made by Daily Caller are so window licking stupid.
Exactly. This is the type of stuff that becomes the conspiracy when the target audience is middle-aged people with zero understanding of how technology actually works. And the authors of these conspiracy theories are also of the same age and lack of understanding. The glaring holes never occurred to them, because they are uneducated about the technical aspects of these things.
Maybe those “REAL conservatives” like @NebraskaFootball have a new love for the Chinese. The Chinese were -after all - our allies in the past. And we know how much REAL conservatives like the past.
Trumps baseless accusation Twitter tantrum continues! From Google to Chinese hackers…
