Nope. Glad we got that straighten out.
the washington post has a recording of the call
…and that right there proves the deep state exists and the media and social media giants are complicit. It’s no wonder why Parlor and OANN are growing so fast.
moonshine:
the washington post has a recording of the call
…and that right there proves the deep state exists and the media and social media giants are complicit.
Hilarious. Now speaking about the recording itself. Any comment on Trumps* actual words?
Hilarious. Now speaking about the recording itself. Any comment on Trumps* actual words?
Of course not. Trump’s demands that the SoS of Georgia break the law for him are unimportant.
It’s much more scandalous that this was revealed to the public!
Hilarious. Now speaking about the recording itself. Any comment on Trumps* actual words?
I heard nothing illegal or criminal in anyway. What I did hear, that I’ve never heard from Trump before though…is desperation.
Of course not. Trump’s demands that the SoS of Georgia break the law for him are unimportant.
What’s the exact quote of this lawbreaking request?
mobiusptc:
Hilarious. Now speaking about the recording itself. Any comment on Trumps* actual words?
I heard nothing illegal or criminal in anyway. What I did hear, that I’ve never heard from Trump before though…is desperation.
You might want to brush up on ga election fraud statute
You might want to brush up on ga election fraud statute
Same question? What’s the exact quote that broke the law?
mobiusptc:
You might want to brush up on ga election fraud statute
Same question? What’s the exact quote that broke the law?
Brush up then we will talk
Brush up then we will talk
That’s right. You’re regurgibleeting what the Post just fed you and can’t answer that simple question.
Smyrna:
mobiusptc:
You might want to brush up on ga election fraud statute
Same question? What’s the exact quote that broke the law?
Brush up then we will talk
We are back to “unless Trump said. ‘I intend to break the law,’ he didn’t to anything wrong.”
That’s right. You’re regurgibleeting what the Post just fed you and can’t answer that simple question.
It was in the thread.
mobiusptc:
Brush up then we will talk
That’s right. You’re regurgibleeting what the Post just fed you and can’t answer that simple question.
Silly to answer a question if a baseline of knowledge has not been established.
TheDoctorIsIn:
Of course not. Trump’s demands that the SoS of Georgia break the law for him are unimportant.
What’s the exact quote of this lawbreaking request?
Apparently it is that he asked the S of S to find 11,790 votes and they assume he meant for the S of S to manufacture them…though that is supposed to be implied.
It was in the thread.
Spell it out. You can do this, I just know it?
Apparently it is that he asked the S of S to find 11,790 votes and they assume he meant for the S of S to manufacture them…though that is supposed to be implied.
This call was made yesterday.
How exactly would the Georgia Secretary of State find any legitimate votes, 60 days after the election and three weeks after the state’s electors voted?
DougBH:
Apparently it is that he asked the S of S to find 11,790 votes and they assume he meant for the S of S to manufacture them…though that is supposed to be implied.
This call was made yesterday.
How exactly would the Georgia Secretary of State find any legitimate votes, 60 days after the election and three weeks after the state’s electors voted?
I don’t think he can. Trump stands to be disappointed, IMO.
I don’t think he can. Trump stands to be disappointed, IMO.
Let me rephrase.
How can a reasonable person believe that Trump was asking the SoS to find uncounted legitimate votes, and not asking him to manufacture votes for him?
That’s why he should stop threatening the GA officials, insisting the make up votes for him? That’s your reason?
