What is it with cons conjuring up imaginary scenarios, then railing against their lib strawman?
I guess it’s easier than dealing with the real world.
What is it with cons conjuring up imaginary scenarios, then railing against their lib strawman?
I guess it’s easier than dealing with the real world.
gooddad409: Mountain_Soldier:I’m wagering that worker didn’t remove any Biden signs.
I bet he didn’t either. What is it with libs?
What is it with cons conjuring up imaginary scenarios, then railing against their lib strawman?
I guess it’s easier than dealing with the real world.
In the real world only Trump signs were removed… any evidence to the contrary?
Any evidence of illegally placed Biden signs?
AmusedObserver: gooddad409: Mountain_Soldier:I’m wagering that worker didn’t remove any Biden signs.
I bet he didn’t either. What is it with libs?
What is it with cons conjuring up imaginary scenarios, then railing against their lib strawman?
I guess it’s easier than dealing with the real world.
In the real world only Trump signs were removed… any evidence to the contrary?
Occam’s razor can answer that for you.
AmusedObserver: gooddad409: Mountain_Soldier:I’m wagering that worker didn’t remove any Biden signs.
I bet he didn’t either. What is it with libs?
What is it with cons conjuring up imaginary scenarios, then railing against their lib strawman?
I guess it’s easier than dealing with the real world.
In the real world only Trump signs were removed… any evidence to the contrary?
In this area 99 percent of the signs are for Trump. However we leave the 3 or 4 Biden signs alone.
Shhh…don’t ruin the pity party.
A question is why he attempted remove the sign without first contacting the property owner.
Not “he”, but the town official who sent the worker out there.
Your article does not go into what led up to this event.
A family at a Michigan residence say they grew tired of people stealing Trump campaign signs from their private property, likely often under cover of night, so it appears they decided to make sure the thieves would pay a price.
A homeowner in Commerce Township decided to tape sharp razor blades to the bottom of the next sign they put out. The blades lined the bottom of the Trump-Pence 2020 sign, so that the next vandal would be in for a surprise.
The sign is on private property and the blades appear to have been visible to careful inspection.
Why was a township worker removing a sign from private property?
Is the owner of the sign responsible for the injury? The township is saying the sign was “booby trapped”.
Where I grew up there were horses in fields enclosed with barbed wire and an electrified fence. Is okay to use similar devices to protect political signs?
It wasn’t private property.
I’m wagering that worker didn’t remove any Biden signs.
Rather no boobytrapped Biden signs.
Mountain_Soldier: AmusedObserver: gooddad409: Mountain_Soldier:I’m wagering that worker didn’t remove any Biden signs.
I bet he didn’t either. What is it with libs?
What is it with cons conjuring up imaginary scenarios, then railing against their lib strawman?
I guess it’s easier than dealing with the real world.
In the real world only Trump signs were removed… any evidence to the contrary?
In this area 99 percent of the signs are for Trump. However we leave the 3 or 4 Biden signs alone.
I wish it was the same here…
Bill.in.PA:A family at a Michigan residence say they grew tired of people stealing Trump campaign signs from their private property, likely often under cover of night, so it appears they decided to make sure the thieves would pay a price.
A homeowner in Commerce Township decided to tape sharp razor blades to the bottom of the next sign they put out. The blades lined the bottom of the Trump-Pence 2020 sign, so that the next vandal would be in for a surprise.
The sign is on private property and the blades appear to have been visible to careful inspection.
Why was a township worker removing a sign from private property?
Is the owner of the sign responsible for the injury? The township is saying the sign was “booby trapped”.
Where I grew up there were horses in fields enclosed with barbed wire and an electrified fence. Is okay to use similar devices to protect political signs?
It wasn’t private property.
From the link.
The ordinance specifies how close a political sign can be to a public roadway, and the sign on private property was deemed ten feet too close.
It was within the right-of-way easement.
Legally similar to a sidewalk.
It was within the right-of-way easement.
Legally similar to a sidewalk.
Not what the linked article says.
Not what the linked article says.
Further reason to not rely on Zerohedge as your source.
A Commerce Township ordinance requires signs to be 33 feet from the center of the roadway. The signs were located 24 feet from the center of the road clearly within the right of way, the Oakland County Sheriff’s Office said in a news release.
A Michigan man had his hand sliced open Wednesday by razor blades found on a Trump-Pence 2020 sign that he was trying to remove.
This is why in some areas some silent trump supporters are maybe afraid of posting their signs because the crazy ones would be problary attacking them.
Clearly you do not.
See, for reference, your whole victim narrative.
It is amazing how easily you guys can convince yourselves that the worker was a bad guy here for doing his job.
If people didn’t steal signs there would have been no need to booby trap it.
You can blame both the owner of the sign and people with bad behavior for the worker getting cut.
I don’t like booby trapped signs, but I have to admit some of them are pretty inventive with hilarious results (just embarrassment for the thief - no one gets hurt).
Ever see the one(video) where the lib tried to grab one out of someone’s yard.
It shocked him and he bounced off down the road shaking his hands.
I did see one where a guy peed on an electrified one
gooddad409:Ever see the one(video) where the lib tried to grab one out of someone’s yard.
It shocked him and he bounced off down the road shaking his hands.
I did see one where a guy peed on an electrified one
Would have loved to seen the dancing around over that one.
not only will the homeowner probably be charge with a crime he will also end up footing the bill for the city workers medical expenses and probably a lot more when the inevitable lawsuit comes
Either way, he got his prize for stupid.