It could be, there aren’t any guarantees.
Bob has an obligation to be remotely decent back to me then.
Get control of yourself please.
You haven’t.
It’s simple. No mention of election fraud in the 2016 or 2020 elections.
I was guilty of it, too.
LOL too funny.
Libs goals is to keep government incompetent as possible to justify their demands for more tax revenues to give to their cronies.
Yes, everyone does have that obligation.
Someone’s healthcare shouldn’t be determined by whether or not others think they deserve it or not though.
That is the McConnell strategy.
It is what drives privatization of public goods.
I didn’t say “deserve” you did. Me paying for it gives me a say.
There is no such thing as “public goods”.
When Bob meets his obligations, I’m more than willing to help.
Than we don’t need to change a thing because the bum already gets healthcare.
Is your problem that you want what the bum has for someone else to pay for your healthcare?
2 Likes
That doesn’t mean anything though. Like the whole taxes giving us a say thing. They never have on any other issue.
Like my taxes have went to bombing innocent people in the Middle East for years upon years. Doesn’t matter who the President is. My rage at that doesn’t matter though.
At least if some of the money we spent in taxes went to healthcare that would help people who are broke that would be a good thing.
Yes, but I can’t. My working son can’t. Why should producers not be able to opt in? What are we protecting, insurance companies?
I don’t choose, my employers do.
My problem is that people’s lives are ruined in this country because of the cost of healthcare.
1 Like
-
Why can’t we legalize weed?
-
Why can’t we expand medicare to allow more younger, healthier people the opt in?
-
Why can’t we give the DACA a legal status in the only country they’ve ever known?
-
What conservative principle do any of these three things violate?
I would like a or all conservatives to answer these questions please.
2 Likes
Mmmmmmm
Consider this . Maybe it will add objectivity to your point of view.
- Man steals money from you.
- Man gives the money to his innocent children.
- Man gets caught and evidence provided that he stole and gave the money to his children.
Now according to our justice system, do the man’s innocent children get to keep your money?
It’s not money, it’s not transportable. They didn’t steal my citizenship.
They are here.
Do we make the children sell their lives to pay it back?
Do we put them in prison until they pay it back?
This is a punt and you know it. I infer from your punt that my implicit argument is irrefutable.
1 Like
