This is not how the First Amendment works

Where was any of his speech restricted? He was allowed to put out that murder conspiracy crap didn’t he?

Maybe he should suggest Spotify expand into tweeting if they are not already and promise to move to Spotify, like Joe Roghan as with his podcasts https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.fastcompany.com/90430804/spotify-might-actually-be-giving-apple-a-run-for-its-money-on-podcasts&ved=2ahUKEwiBnoO699LpAhVmzDgGHT_BDucQFjARegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw1QgDyBoz0FpXEAKt4sWqhr

Elections do not suspend the concept of free speech, neither do geographical borders. We are not at war with Russia, I am free to read or listen to whatever they want to say, even during elections.

The US most definitely has jurisdiction over telecommunications that take place on US soil. Welcome to the real world

This country was built on anonymous speech.

Yes. He should leave twitter for Spotify like Joe Roghan.

He is well within his rights to boycott or just leave.

Secret, unreported foreign interference in elections is illegal. I have no idea why you are defending this.

Oh wait, yes I do

No sorry, this country has no right to keep me from reading whatever is on the internet. What do you think this is, China? Do you want government filters excluding us from parts of the web?

I am also unsure as to what about the President’s speech was infringed upon?

Where was he not allowed to say what he wanted to say?

Irrelevant to foreign interference taken place by foreign governments

We have zero jurisdiction over what Russians want to put on the web.

Free speech, learn it, live it.

I never said you have no right to read what you want. Nice strawman. I am talking about unregistered intelligence campaigns by foreign governments/agents whose purpose is to explicitly meddle in our elections. That’s illegal. Quit defending it.

I have never before thought that someone would be arguing in favor of a hostile foreign intelligence service being able to run a signals Intelligence operation on the American people unhindered.

2 Likes

All for Donald Trump. Of all people on this Earth

3 Likes

Looks like his conspiracy message still got out there. …Where was his speech stifled? Or is it just that he is being challenged the problem?

2 Likes

No it isn’t. we don’t have jurisdiction, our campaign laws are not global. Jeesh.

Well you’re wrong again. The United States has jurisdiction over the networks and internet providers in this country. How the ■■■■ else are you supposed to shut down child porn or money laundering

3 Likes

So, so powerful.

3 Likes

We have jurisdiction over the internet providers and networks in this country. Do you not know how the internet works? Where do you think internet cables are buried? Who owns the satellites you buy internet from?