Wait, so they renamed it to the name of the magazine who ran stories that included the same kinds of things Campbell is being criticized for? I mean, was Astounding some sort of bastion of progressive racial inclusion or what?
They renamed it to the original title of the magazine… since it is now called Analog.
The word “Astounding” doesn’t carry any racial or sexist bias that I know of… but a guy who wrote editorials defending slavery and segregation does.
Campbell wouldn’t publish a work by one of the great SF writers, Samuel Delany, because the main character was a black man.
So yeah… purging his regressive ideology from a science fiction award… a genre that when done correctly is incredibly introspective and forward looking at the same time… is progress.
The old stories still exist as does the old version of the magazine.
Analog, being a magazine that inherited the large influence that Campbell built has been wise to keep what was good about bringing the genre out of the pulp beginnings into a serious genre but ejecting as much of the baggage as possible.
No Sci fi authors have complained about this and previous winners of the award are happy with this change and find it to be right and good.
I know that this is getting into some nerdy and frankly diminutive issues, but in the past few years the Hugo and Campbell awards around the time of Gamer Gate was under pressure from a right wing anti diversity group that called themselves “sad puppies”. Because of how the awards are organized, they were able to game the system to stuff the ballot box. This resulted in no awards given in a lot of categories in 2015.
So this change is just a small part of the ongoing culture war where the shift from the standard is moving towards a more broad appeal.
I didn’t see that as all white people, just mid to old white dudes. And the way that white men all over this country keep crying about being picked on, I think he nailed it.
Got it, so it’s ok to disparage people based on race as long as you limit that disparagement to certain age groups. Like you know, some black people are ok, but those young black guys, all gang bangers. Am I doing it right?
You are trying to act like the poster came in out of nowhere and broad brushed all white people. I would support you if I saw him doing that. That would be wrong.
But the OP started a thread about a very specific demographic and I’d wager that every one of you coming in here piling on with the crying fit that demographic.
So I don’t see it as broad brushing, but addressing the issue. He could add the word “some” if it would make you FEEL better, but in this instance it was spot on. White dudes in this country are having a hard time letting go of the idea that they are superior to others. And that the reason so many of them are in positions of power is this countries racist past.
Now carry on with the ridiculous comparisons if you like, I have to go.