What he’s pointing out is that since Trump is heavily influenced by what the CEC says he will never make that compromise.
Did the parents break the law bringing the children here? Are the children here illegally?
Sorry, a law was broken, the kids (and most libs) think they poor kids shouldn’t be held accountible.
Guess anyone who deals in stolen property that didn’t actually steal it shouldn’t be held accountable either then.
So much for the ancient Judeo-Christian principle of not holding the children accountable for the sins of their parents…
And your analogy is ridiculous. People are not posssessions.
It ain’t right to hold their legal status hostage for a political victory.
It’s already been offered and trump rejected.
Allan
That’s a hard hearted stance.
Which is why obama created the DACA program.
There are different types of illegals in the United States.
You want to deport them all. That’s simply impossible.
Better a common sense solution to the problem.
Allan
Did the parents break the law bringing the children here? Are the children here illegally?
Sorry, a law was broken, the kids (and most libs) think they poor kids shouldn’t be held accountible.
Guess anyone who deals in stolen property that didn’t actually steal it shouldn’t be held accountable either then.
Congress can easily pass a law remedying this. That scenario is not analogous. DACA recipients are not depriving anyone of their property by being granted legal status.
Trump could have had $25 billion for the wall in a similar exchange. He turned it down.
#winning
You do know Trump turned down the deal you posted about in March of last year, right?
So if someone robbed a bank, and gave you money from it. And you spend it KNOWING it’s stolen money – instead of returning it – have you done something wrong?
In this analogy, the creamers would be the money.
Do you blame the money for being stolen?
Guess anyone who deals in stolen property that didn’t actually steal it shouldn’t be held accountable either then.
In these analogies of yours, the dreamers would be the property. Not the people dealing it.
Yet your plan doesn’t protect them during the next year either so where is the motivation for Democrats?
I don’t have a plan. I’m not in government.
You do know Trump turned down the deal you posted about in March of last year, right?
He should have worked harder to get wall funding while the republicans controlled congress.
Did I say that.
But even with juvenile court, kids are held accountable for actions correct?
I don’t have a plan. I’m not in government.
Fine. The proposal you outlined in the OP is a non starter as it doesn’t give dreamers any more protections over the next 2 years than they have now
But even with juvenile court, kids are held accountable for actions correct?
For things their parents did? No
That’s a hard hearted stance.
Not the first time I’ve herd that about my stance.
Which is why obama created the DACA program.
And he had NO constitutional authority to do so, yet he created a law out of thin air.
There are different types of illegals in the United States.
Yes there are. And if they came here illegally, they should be removed from the country PERIOD.
You want to deport them all. That’s simply impossible.
Unfortunately I know this. But doesn’t mean as they are found they shouldn’t be deported.
Better a common sense solution to the problem.
Welcoming them with open arms is NOT a common sense solution.
Yes there are. And if they came here illegally, they should be removed from the country PERIOD.
With 89% of Americans wanting a path of citizenship for dreamers deportation is off the table.
Snow96:Did the parents break the law bringing the children here? Are the children here illegally?
Sorry, a law was broken, the kids (and most libs) think they poor kids shouldn’t be held accountible.
Guess anyone who deals in stolen property that didn’t actually steal it shouldn’t be held accountable either then.
Congress can easily pass a law remedying this. That scenario is not analogous. DACA recipients are not depriving anyone of their property by being granted legal status.
Congress has not been able to pass this easily because of Republican opposition.
He should have worked harder to get wall funding while the republicans controlled congress.
Why didn’t he?
Donald is never going to get his wall. So anything he proposes that includes funding for a wall is a no go in the House.