Crossed at El Paso in 2007.
i’m aware of the “here’s why you can’t dare question this” narrative thx
Well, if Biden were not America’s most formidable domestic enemy, and honored his sworn duty to protect the United States against invasions, he would immediately re-instate the previous president’s immigration -policies, some of which are:
-
end catch and release
-
complete building the wall
-
remove immigrants who were ordered removed but who have remained here illegally
-
requiring asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while they await court hearings in their cases
-
put an end to sanctuary cities
-
adopt a strict merit based immigration system and refuse entry of those likely to become a public charge
-
stop chain migration
The above would be a good start! Do you agree?
JWK
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion__Article 4, Section 4, U.S. Constitution
No… a few of those are illegal.
It’s actually the only branch of government that has to write opinions that justify their decisions with citations to legal authority so they’re probably the most predictable actors in our government.
They’re dropping like a rock. Every thing he does is a train wreck. Just enjoy your inflation, high gas prices and border mess. You voted for it.
How do you know that?
Your total(65 million) i think is MUCH closer to correct.
yes indeed. the number was chosen specifically. notice the foot stomping reactions
people do NOT want anyone realizing that
1 Like
They don’t want anyone daring to say it even.
Rule of thumb the harder libs stomp the closer to the truth one is.
1 Like
I would be very skeptical of press releases from a government that is banning reporters from observing the process they claim is happening at the border.
The truth is, the majority are released into our country with their promise they will show up at a immigration judges’ hearing. Of course the vast majority never show up at their hearing but do show up in sanctuary cities.
JWK
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion__Article 4, Section 4, U.S. Constitution
Do you apply that same skepticism to Trump government?
So, according to you advancing the general welfare of the United States and her citizens, with regard to immigration policies, is illegal?
Why are you so intent on flooding the United States with the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled and criminal populations of other countries? And why is it illegal for the United States to adopt immigration policies promoting the general welfare of the United States and her citizens?
BTW, when was that part of our federal constitution repealed which commands the federal government to protect the United States against invasions?
JWK
To support Joe Biden and Kamala Harris is to support a continuance with Obama’s love affair with our Global Governance Crowd
1 Like
Where they are making claims while preventing scrutiny… yes.
Indeed! See: Team Biden’s disgraceful border media blackout
3/21/21
”Because most migrants are crossing on federal land, the feds have the power to keep the press away, but Moore says there’s “no precedent” for them doing so on this scale. It can only be because Biden wants to hide the extent of his complete failure at the border — and just how many people are being waved in.”
JWK
Well Jezcoe?
Why are you so intent on flooding the United States with the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled and criminal populations of other countries? And why is it illegal for the United States to adopt immigration policies promoting the general welfare of the United States and her citizens?
BTW, when was that part of our federal constitution repealed which commands, as a priority, the federal government to protect the United States against invasions?
JWK
Without a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalism [our MSM], and activist traitorous judges and Justices, the crisis at our southern border would never have grown to what now amounts to an outright invasion and threatens the general welfare of the United States and her citizens.
There is a tried and true method for blaming a good part of societal ills on an “other”. That if that part can be controlled or eradicated that there would a paradise on earth.
Using exclusionary words like “invasion” and “illegal” only further makes an exclusionary group of “others”
This is used in a political way to create a paralysis around an issue so that if there is a failure of eradicating 100% of the “other” than there is either a failure or even better a blame that can be assigned.
This leads to a situation where no compromise can be had. A Wall HAS to be built even though it would be ineffective in most areas. “Catch and Release” is demonized even though it would be impossible to hold everyone in detainment while they await due process. “Removing immigrants” becomes a cry around kicking out Americans who were brought here as children and has known no other real home. Making asylum seekers stay in Mexico just foists our problems onto another country. Merit based and public charge complaints are vapid and the recently overturned rule was ill defined.
Chain Migration… the thing that has been done for almost the entire country’s history is now all of a sudden a bad thing.
Even if 100% of the requests were fulfilled, there would be no change. There would just be more complaints. The goal is never to solve an issue but to continually find scapegoats for political gain.
I find it concerning that a good portion of the complaints are involving legal immigration and that legal process is being lumped in with an “invasion”
It isn’t a good look.
1 Like
All that and you never answered what was asked.
Why are you so intent on flooding the United States with the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled and criminal populations of other countries? And why is it illegal for the United States to adopt immigration policies promoting the general welfare of the United States and her citizens?
And, when was that part of our federal constitution repealed which commands, as a priority, the federal government to protect the United States against invasions?
JWK
Without a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalism [our MSM], and activist traitorous judges and Justices, the crisis at our southern border would never have grown to what now amounts to an outright invasion and threatens the general welfare of the United States and her citizens.
