The science of search engines

Google making trumpbags whine like brokenhearted schoolgirls…

Good.

3 Likes

Sure did.

And their posts about Google never implementing the algorithms does not refute the fact that they CAN. Any claim that only the scientifically ignorant believe that you can ignores the reality of Google employees saying they want to do it.

It’s like the onion of defensive lies.

“It isn’t happening”

gives way to

“It is impossible. A computer is not partisan”

which then gives way to

“They didn’t actually implement the algorithms”

which gives way to

“Well it’s a private business”

which gives way to

"You can make or use another search engine that you like better.

And

“Go ahead and cry about it.”

Yep… from bold faced lying to “so what” in 6 easy steps.

1 Like

And you still have zero proof, cry more.

So why don’t you make a better search engine?

Capitalism, baby!!!

I dont really care. I know how to circumvent Google’s partisan tricks. But it’s fun showing how libs are either ignorant of computer science or deceptive as hell.

1 Like

Why are keeping your methods of circumvention secret from all your fellow conservatives? Please share…

So that google can use counter-countermeasures? Naaa. From what I’ve seen, my fellow conservatives have the ability to get the truth. I have my own methods. It is better if we don’t share. Then if Google implements something that blocks the truth from one of us, others will still have methods that work.

Nice try.

LMAO… Now we know you are full of it… You know they can see every search string submitted… ever written a parser?

Thanks for the laugh, CMI.

Here’s what you do to circumvent their partisan tricks.

In either the search bar of your engine or at the Google home page type in your query. Hit enter. Scroll until you find the response to your query that you are looking for.

Done.

Anyone up for a lex and yacc discussion? :joy:

1 Like

I never thought they couldn’t manipulate results.

I said they didn’t.

Dumb Trump supporters are going to read this piece and think they actually did something wrong when it never went beyond discussions.

What libs actually believe this? What cons actually believe this? Who is actually stupid enough to actually believe this? I’ve literally never heard of a single person who actually believes this.

What libs actually believe this? What cons actually believe this? Who is actually stupid enough to actually believe this? I’ve literally never heard of a single person who actually believes this.

Boy, what a nothingburger article and thread.

Fox’s 2nd lieutenant attack dog throws a little hissy about Google.

Then Fox goes to a conservative watchdog group to comment, despite literally zero proof that Google actually did what some people in Google wanted to do.

When people talk about hair being on fire and frothing at the mouth, this thread is an ACTUAL example of that.

But they dont know me or what I’m doing. I’m just another one of their billion users.

Is your answer then, that you have never written a parser and therefore have no idea what you are talking about?

You can’t write a parser for something you can’t identify.

Except you’ve done no such thing.

Wow, you just said is seriously full of bovine excrement!

Even if you were doing these super secret circumventions which you aren’t, the fact that you don’t seem to understand that Googles search engine, their platform, and indeed their algorithms are designed to present the most relevant content that YOU want both ad sponsored and organically, based on over 200 different factors, that is how optimal ad monetization.

But just for the fun of how you make a list of a few conservative things that should be showing up in google results, and everyone here who wishes to participate can do their own google search and post the links to whatever it is you seem to be looking for.

Hey, this sounds interesting. I’d love to see a few examples of manipulated search results.