The Reverse Is Not True - Why Do Conservatives Tolerate Hate?

[DMK]

@lulubee

BS. They are running as Republicans. They now represent a constiuency of your party.

Eh… Okay …

Neo Natzis and White Supremacists are the representatives of the Republican party.

[DougBH]

@lulubee

The racist candidates are expected to lose, b

@lulubee

@DougBH

Major difference…Republicans repudiate these people while Democrats will forgive and forget while in their interests (Byrd) or say it isn’t racist if it is hatred against whites (see threads on Jeong).

That’s why they are on the ballot this year as Republicans.

They are on the ballot this year as Republicans because the vast mainstream of the party cannot legally remove them. It is the choice of the extremists. They are not “embraced” by the party, they are using and abusing the party…unlike the socialist becoming mainstream in the Democrat party.

[DMK]

@DougBH

They are on the ballot this year as Republicans because the vast mainstream of the party cannot legally remove them. It is the choice of the extremists. They are not “embraced” by the party, they are using and abusing the party…unlike the socialist becoming mainstream in the Democrat party.

(((sigh))) thank you. A voice of reason vs. hysteria.

[reflechissez]

@DMK

@lulubee

Everyone knows what you are trying to imply.

What party today are white supremacists and Neo Nazis members of?

I’ll give you a hint:

I don’t give a rat about the white supremacists and Neo Nazis. They are an outlier. Just like Robert KKK Byrd.

I’ll give you a hint. They no more represent the Republican party than Robert KKK Byrd represents Democrats.

Then why did you start down this stupid rabbit hole?

[reflechissez]

@DougBH

@lulubee

The racist candidates are expected to lose, b

@lulubee

@DougBH

Major difference…Republicans repudiate these people while Democrats will forgive and forget while in their interests (Byrd) or say it isn’t racist if it is hatred against whites (see threads on Jeong).

That’s why they are on the ballot this year as Republicans.

They are on the ballot this year as Republicans because the vast mainstream of the party cannot legally remove them. It is the choice of the extremists. They are not “embraced” by the party, they are using and abusing the party…unlike the socialist becoming mainstream in the Democrat party.

Why don’t they run as democrats?

[DougBH]

You want em…take em.

[DMK]

See post 130 which I responded to. Which then you responded to.

[DMK]

@DougBH

You want em…take em.

That would be great wouldn’t it? Geez, these outliers need their own party of weirdness.

No one wants to claim them…

[lulubee]

@DougBH

@lulubee

The racist candidates are expected to lose, b

@lulubee

@DougBH

Major difference…Republicans repudiate these people while Democrats will forgive and forget while in their interests (Byrd) or say it isn’t racist if it is hatred against whites (see threads on Jeong).

That’s why they are on the ballot this year as Republicans.

They are on the ballot this year as Republicans because the vast mainstream of the party cannot legally remove them. It is the choice of the extremists. They are not “embraced” by the party, they are using and abusing the party…unlike the socialist becoming mainstream in the Democrat party.

You are not fooling anyone. You all voted for a racist for President and now you have White Supremacist and Nazis in your party running for office.

No amount of obfuscation is going to change that fact.

[Borgia]

@DMK

You asked if it is left wing or right wing to secure our borders (or as you stated “tighten”). As if that is the only choice. It isn’t.

Funny. When this forum discusses illegal immigration all we hear from conservatives is how the Democrats are for open borders.

Now that you want to disassociate conservatives from the Nazis calling for stricter border enforcement. Very convenient.

[lulubee]

@DMK

No one wants to claim them…

Not true.

The Republicans have claimed them.

“Very fine people” according to the Republican you voted for President.

Your party is infested with these lower than pond scum people.

[DMK]

@Borgia_dude_dude

only choice. It isn’t.

Funny. When this forum discusses illegal immigration all we hear from conservatives is how the Democrats are for open borders.

Now that you want to disassociate conservatives from the Nazis calling for stricter border enforcement. Very convenient.

Without broad brushing: are there democrats and republicans calling for stricter border enforcement?

[DMK]

@lulubee

Not true.

The Republicans have claimed them.

“Very fine people” according to the Republican you voted for President.

Your party is infested with these lower than pond scum people.

Their are “pond scum” people who associate themselves with your party as well. Do they represent your party as a whole?

[reflechissez]

@DougBH

You want em…take em.

No one noticed that you didn’t answer the question. Really, they didn’t.

[DougBH]

@Borgia_dude_dude

@DMK

You asked if it is left wing or right wing to secure our borders (or as you stated “tighten”). As if that is the only choice. It isn’t.

Funny. When this forum discusses illegal immigration all we hear from conservatives is how the Democrats are for open borders.

Now that you want to disassociate conservatives from the Nazis calling for stricter border enforcement. Very convenient.

So you are saying that Republicans are the party of NAZIs because they want to strictly enforce our existing laws on border enforcement?
I think you are now clarifying the Democrat position for us. Enforcing immigration laws is NAZI. Fine, you run with that.

[lulubee]

@DMK

@lulubee

Not true.

The Republicans have claimed them.

“Very fine people” according to the Republican you voted for President.

Your party is infested with these lower than pond scum people.

Their are “pond scum” people who associate themselves with your party as well. Do they represent your party as a whole?

Who do you think are “pond scum” that are Democrats? Democratic Socialists? BLM members? Labor union members? UnidosUS?

[Borgia]

@DMK

Without broad brushing: are there democrats and republicans calling for stricter border enforcement?

Sure. Are groups defined by the minority voices or the majority voices.

As I said earlier, there are always dissenters from majority opinion within a group. If we allow that to disallow noting the majority trend as an identifier then we cannot define groups at all.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@lulubee

@Call_me_Ishmael

@lulubee

And what party did the Dixiecrats join after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed?

There is a reason the South has been overwhelmingly Republican since then.

How many Democrat US senators that voted against the 1964 CRA became Republican US senators afterwards? One?

But it’s your party now that not only embraces these scum but they are also running for elected office as Republicans.

Well …first of all…as soon as the election board let’s me complete my transition to Democrat… I’ll be a Democrat.

Second… both parties take votes from wherever they can get them without “embracing” them at all.

[TheRedComet]

BLM has a good cause but they ruined it with their actions.

They have hurt more than they have helped.

[lulubee]

@Call_me_Ishmael

Well …first of all…as soon as the election board let’s me complete my transition to Democrat… I’ll be a Democrat.

You must be the “pond scum” in the Democratic Party I was asked about.

I don’t care that you are a member of the Democratic Party. I doubt any other Democratic Party member will care either. It’s not like you are going to vote Democratic and I highly doubt your one vote will make a difference in a primary race, either. So welcome.