I agree. But the current state of the economy is tied directly to COVID-19. The response, the number of deaths, it’s all tied together.
The state of the economy is tied to the response. 100,000 is a statistic, not a tragedy. Probably Stalin.
The blame for the deaths will be placed on the virus. The blame for the economy will be placed on the pols.
In most cases, very little will move or change how Trump supporters and non-supporters view him.
Or Biden supporters.
100,000 is a statistic, not a tragedy.
I urge Trump to say that exact thing during a debate.
WuWei:100,000 is a statistic, not a tragedy.
I urge Trump to say that exact thing during a debate.
I urge Biden to say anything.
I’ll agree to a point. In most cases, very little will move or change how Trump supporters and non-supporters view him. Including the 100,000 COVID-19 deaths. Purely from an optics standpoint, 100,000 is large number that will be associated with Trump’s handling of the pandemic. I personally think this will hurt his standing with moderates or anyone considering his response to COVID-19 as a potential voting issue. I just doesn’t look good for him.
It’s going to be a lot higher than 100,000. That’s the number we’re landing at on lockdown. I hope I am wrong and end up looking stupid on this, but those pictures of everyone partying like it’s 1999 this weekend are really scary.
I challenge you to do the same.
Who is denying liberty…Hint…It isn’t Trump.
I urge Biden to say anything.
Trump’s opponent will surely have an advantage given how 100,000 Americans didn’t die while their administration was in power.
Over 90% elderly and largely in nursing homes.
It is very important to note this.
Sknyluv:I’ll agree to a point. In most cases, very little will move or change how Trump supporters and non-supporters view him. Including the 100,000 COVID-19 deaths. Purely from an optics standpoint, 100,000 is large number that will be associated with Trump’s handling of the pandemic. I personally think this will hurt his standing with moderates or anyone considering his response to COVID-19 as a potential voting issue. I just doesn’t look good for him.
It’s going to be a lot higher than 100,000. That’s the number we’re landing at on lockdown. I hope I am wrong and end up looking stupid on this, but those pictures of everyone partying like it’s 1999 this weekend are really scary.
All we can do is hope.
Sknyluv:I’ll agree to a point. In most cases, very little will move or change how Trump supporters and non-supporters view him. Including the 100,000 COVID-19 deaths. Purely from an optics standpoint, 100,000 is large number that will be associated with Trump’s handling of the pandemic. I personally think this will hurt his standing with moderates or anyone considering his response to COVID-19 as a potential voting issue. I just doesn’t look good for him.
It’s going to be a lot higher than 100,000. That’s the number we’re landing at on lockdown. I hope I am wrong and end up looking stupid on this, but those pictures of everyone partying like it’s 1999 this weekend are really scary.
The number will increase, but the 100,000 is a milestone that will be latched on to.
PurpnGold: thinkingman:and now dems and media do the exact same
how embarrassing
They are calling out hypocrisy.
They are being hypocrites themselves. They never had a problem with Obama golfing but if Trump does it then that is “evil”.
Trump literally told you he was never going to golf, that he’d be too busy to ever leave the White House.
Forcefield: Sknyluv:I’ll agree to a point. In most cases, very little will move or change how Trump supporters and non-supporters view him. Including the 100,000 COVID-19 deaths. Purely from an optics standpoint, 100,000 is large number that will be associated with Trump’s handling of the pandemic. I personally think this will hurt his standing with moderates or anyone considering his response to COVID-19 as a potential voting issue. I just doesn’t look good for him.
It’s going to be a lot higher than 100,000. That’s the number we’re landing at on lockdown. I hope I am wrong and end up looking stupid on this, but those pictures of everyone partying like it’s 1999 this weekend are really scary.
The number will increase, but the 100,000 is a milestone that will be latched on to.
It’s 100,000 since February 29. Less than 3 months.
Hey they were all old people!
It is very important to note this.
In such a short span of time, the party of “family values” and “sanctity of life” has flushed what was left of their integrity straight down the crapper - and all of this for a miserable gluttonous whiney impetuous willfully ignorant uncaring grifter. For what? A ■■■■■■■ wall? Lower taxes for billionaires? So embarassing.
The one enjoyment the guy gets.
He doesn’t vacation or travel frivolously.
He just enjoys golf…at his own course.
WuWei:I urge Biden to say anything.
Trump’s opponent will surely have an advantage given how 100,000 Americans didn’t die while their administration was in power.
Advantage with irrelevant? The deceased won’t be voting.
100,000 didn’t die because his administration is in power either, and that’s an easy narrative. Cuomo (among others) already gave him the clips.
You think Americans are going to blame Trump for the deaths caused by “Chinah!”? Dems will try, I don’t think it will work.
Americans will blame him for their current misery if the unemployment stays the way it is. He knows that and so does the DNC and media.
The pivot has already been made by both sides.
The election will be about the living, not the dead.
It’s 100,000 since February 29. Less than 3 months.
Hey they were all old people!
It’s just gonna be difficult for the Trump team to spin, “Hey look, it was ONLY 100,000 deaths. It could have been SO much worse.” That’s a tough sell.
Over 90% elderly and largely in nursing homes.
And largely in what states?
LucyLou:It’s 100,000 since February 29. Less than 3 months.
Hey they were all old people!
It’s just gonna be difficult for the Trump team to spin, “Hey look, it was ONLY 100,000 deaths. It could have been SO much worse.” That’s a tough sell.
The “experts” already did that for him with their models.
It is when you’re doing it too.
Did Obama have a problem with previous presidents golfing? Did Trump have a problem with Obama golfing?
See the hypocrisy? Cover your right eye