He he he he he …
What about Dem Party…where did it go…?
Way to the Left, and while loosing bigly, to boot.
Again, polls were correct for 2016. Hillary won the popular vote as predicted by polls. No poll predicted EC totals.
Again, polls were correct for 2016. Hillary won the popular vote as predicted by polls. No poll predicted EC totals.
That’s like measuring yards gained when is touchdowns that win the game.
The Left needs to face reality: Trump is winning
This guy gets it. What the left doesn’t understand is that they have lied, twisted and distorted the facts, feigned outrage so much over the past couple of years that 2/3 of the country doesn’t even take them seriously anymore. Don’t get me wrong, there is a portion of the right who did the same thing when Obama was in office, but the difference is that the rest of the right called them on it. There is practically nobody on the left that is willing to do that, and the few that do are practically destroyed by their peers for breaking lock step.
Two-Thirds? Yes I know, I originally wrote 2/3. Yes, that number used to be over 1/2. That’s how far your support has fallen since the election. Feel free to argue, but remember that we don’t take you seriously. Feel free to post sources that contradict what Mr. Goodwin and I have said, but remember that we don’t trust your sources. That’s how low your credibility is now.
Just wait until November. The conservative gains are going to be HUGE.
Huge? Not likely but the “Blue Wave” is dead and buried.
Alec_Trillian:The Left needs to face reality: Trump is winning
This guy gets it. What the left doesn’t understand is that they have lied, twisted and distorted the facts, feigned outrage so much over the past couple of years that 2/3 of the country doesn’t even take them seriously anymore. Don’t get me wrong, there is a portion of the right who did the same thing when Obama was in office, but the difference is that the rest of the right called them on it. There is practically nobody on the left that is willing to do that, and the few that do are practically destroyed by their peers for breaking lock step.
Two-Thirds? Yes I know, I originally wrote 2/3. Yes, that number used to be over 1/2. That’s how far your support has fallen since the election. Feel free to argue, but remember that we don’t take you seriously. Feel free to post sources that contradict what Mr. Goodwin and I have said, but remember that we don’t trust your sources. That’s how low your credibility is now.
Just wait until November. The conservative gains are going to be HUGE.
Huge? Not likely but the “Blue Wave” is dead and buried.
I pray you are right. They have all become deranged.
Blackwolf:Left needs to face the realty that enough of voting Americans are either apathetic or enthusiastically on board with Donald’s idiocy.
To whit: we are screwed for the foreseeable future.
BUT OBAMA/CLINTON
Away from coastal states, Obama couldn’t be elected dog catcher.
Arguing that if one excludes where the majority of the people in the country live … then “X” …is a tenuous place to be.
BornAgainChristian: Blackwolf:Left needs to face the realty that enough of voting Americans are either apathetic or enthusiastically on board with Donald’s idiocy.
To whit: we are screwed for the foreseeable future.
BUT OBAMA/CLINTON
Away from coastal states, Obama couldn’t be elected dog catcher.
Arguing that if one excludes where the majority of the people in the country live … then “X” …is a tenuous place to be.
Its like arguing touchdowns win the game, when the other side want’s total yardage gained to count more.
Dems are becoming a coastal party, only the loons in California (in some areas) and NY (in some areas) think open borders and getting rid of ICE are good ideas.
Jezcoe: BornAgainChristian: Blackwolf:Left needs to face the realty that enough of voting Americans are either apathetic or enthusiastically on board with Donald’s idiocy.
To whit: we are screwed for the foreseeable future.
BUT OBAMA/CLINTON
Away from coastal states, Obama couldn’t be elected dog catcher.
Arguing that if one excludes where the majority of the people in the country live … then “X” …is a tenuous place to be.
Its like arguing touchdowns win the game, when the other side want’s total yardage gained to count more.
Dems are becoming a coastal party, only the loons in California (in some areas) and NY (in some areas) think open borders and getting rid of ICE are good ideas.
He coasts are where the majority of the people in the country live.
It is really really dumb to say… If it weren’t for “X” then “Y” would never happen… because it is counter factual.
Flip the argument around to … if it weren’t for Texas…
See how dumb that sounds?
Thinking that the population occupying about 10% of the country should be able to steamroll the rest of us is very dangerous thinking.
That’s why we are a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
For about the last fifty years your side hasn’t been able to make any gains with it’s agenda outside of the courthouse and that’s about to change for at least the next one or two generations as we return to being a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
Thinking that the population occupying about 10% of the country should be able to steamroll the rest of us is very dangerous thinking.
That’s why we are a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
For about the last fifty years your side hasn’t been able to make any gains with it’s agenda outside of the courthouse and that’s about to change for at least the next one or two generations as we return to being a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
Once again… tha 10% is where the majority of the people actually live. People vote… not land.
Conservatives have an advantage in the Senate.
They always will.
Do I think that their concerns are over represented? Sure.
I don’t constantly harp on it because that is the system that we live under.
WildRose:Thinking that the population occupying about 10% of the country should be able to steamroll the rest of us is very dangerous thinking.
That’s why we are a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
For about the last fifty years your side hasn’t been able to make any gains with it’s agenda outside of the courthouse and that’s about to change for at least the next one or two generations as we return to being a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
Once again… tha 10% is where the majority of the people actually live. People vote… not land.
Conservatives have an advantage in the Senate.
They always will.
Do I think that their concerns are over represented? Sure.
I don’t constantly harp on it because that is the system that we live under.
And the proper answer to this remains the same post you quoted.
Thinking that the population occupying about 10% of the country should be able to steamroll the rest of us is very dangerous thinking.
That’s why we are a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
For about the last fifty years your side hasn’t been able to make any gains with it’s agenda outside of the courthouse and that’s about to change for at least the next one or two generations as we return to being a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
BornAgainChristian: Jezcoe: BornAgainChristian: Blackwolf:Left needs to face the realty that enough of voting Americans are either apathetic or enthusiastically on board with Donald’s idiocy.
To whit: we are screwed for the foreseeable future.
BUT OBAMA/CLINTON
Away from coastal states, Obama couldn’t be elected dog catcher.
Arguing that if one excludes where the majority of the people in the country live … then “X” …is a tenuous place to be.
Its like arguing touchdowns win the game, when the other side want’s total yardage gained to count more.
Dems are becoming a coastal party, only the loons in California (in some areas) and NY (in some areas) think open borders and getting rid of ICE are good ideas.
He coasts are where the majority of the people in the country live.
It is really really dumb to say… If it weren’t for “X” then “Y” would never happen… because it is counter factual.
Flip the argument around to … if it weren’t for Texas…
See how dumb that sounds?
Irrelevant. Electoral college protects smaller states from bigger ones. Its “the United STATES”, and its not a democracy, its a Republic.
Touchdowns win the football game. The other team could have a great ground game, rack up major gains in yardage far above the other team, but if they fail to get more touchdowns, they lose the game.
Same with the election. You gotta get more electoral college votes, not popular votes.
Trump wasn’t playing the game for popular votes, he strategized for electoral votes and he got 'em.
Jezcoe: WildRose:Thinking that the population occupying about 10% of the country should be able to steamroll the rest of us is very dangerous thinking.
That’s why we are a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
For about the last fifty years your side hasn’t been able to make any gains with it’s agenda outside of the courthouse and that’s about to change for at least the next one or two generations as we return to being a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
Once again… tha 10% is where the majority of the people actually live. People vote… not land.
Conservatives have an advantage in the Senate.
They always will.
Do I think that their concerns are over represented? Sure.
I don’t constantly harp on it because that is the system that we live under.
And the proper answer to this remains the same post you quoted.
Thinking that the population occupying about 10% of the country should be able to steamroll the rest of us is very dangerous thinking.
That’s why we are a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
For about the last fifty years your side hasn’t been able to make any gains with it’s agenda outside of the courthouse and that’s about to change for at least the next one or two generations as we return to being a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
I will once again reply that it is people who it’s and are represented… not land.
WildRose: Jezcoe: WildRose:Thinking that the population occupying about 10% of the country should be able to steamroll the rest of us is very dangerous thinking.
That’s why we are a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
For about the last fifty years your side hasn’t been able to make any gains with it’s agenda outside of the courthouse and that’s about to change for at least the next one or two generations as we return to being a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
Once again… tha 10% is where the majority of the people actually live. People vote… not land.
Conservatives have an advantage in the Senate.
They always will.
Do I think that their concerns are over represented? Sure.
I don’t constantly harp on it because that is the system that we live under.
And the proper answer to this remains the same post you quoted.
Thinking that the population occupying about 10% of the country should be able to steamroll the rest of us is very dangerous thinking.
That’s why we are a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
For about the last fifty years your side hasn’t been able to make any gains with it’s agenda outside of the courthouse and that’s about to change for at least the next one or two generations as we return to being a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
I will once again reply that it is people who it’s and are represented… not land.
And you remain completely wrong. The entire purpose of the senate is to protect the interests of the states.
It is the various districts, determined by population that is represented in the house.
We don’t even elect presidents by the popular vote.
Jezcoe: WildRose:Thinking that the population occupying about 10% of the country should be able to steamroll the rest of us is very dangerous thinking.
That’s why we are a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
For about the last fifty years your side hasn’t been able to make any gains with it’s agenda outside of the courthouse and that’s about to change for at least the next one or two generations as we return to being a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
Once again… tha 10% is where the majority of the people actually live. People vote… not land.
Conservatives have an advantage in the Senate.
They always will.
Do I think that their concerns are over represented? Sure.
I don’t constantly harp on it because that is the system that we live under.
And the proper answer to this remains the same post you quoted.
Thinking that the population occupying about 10% of the country should be able to steamroll the rest of us is very dangerous thinking.
That’s why we are a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
For about the last fifty years your side hasn’t been able to make any gains with it’s agenda outside of the courthouse and that’s about to change for at least the next one or two generations as we return to being a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
Hence leftist meltdown, they know the courts are changing and they can’t do a thing to stop it.
In fact, Rush Limbaugh speculated leftist attempts to strip Trump of power vis a vis the travel bans, backfired. It may have influenced some of the wins Trump got at the Supreme Court.
That is one comically misinformed post right there.
All the polls had EV predictions and Clinton winning
LOL…Thanks!
Jezcoe: WildRose: Jezcoe: WildRose:Thinking that the population occupying about 10% of the country should be able to steamroll the rest of us is very dangerous thinking.
That’s why we are a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
For about the last fifty years your side hasn’t been able to make any gains with it’s agenda outside of the courthouse and that’s about to change for at least the next one or two generations as we return to being a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
Once again… tha 10% is where the majority of the people actually live. People vote… not land.
Conservatives have an advantage in the Senate.
They always will.
Do I think that their concerns are over represented? Sure.
I don’t constantly harp on it because that is the system that we live under.
And the proper answer to this remains the same post you quoted.
Thinking that the population occupying about 10% of the country should be able to steamroll the rest of us is very dangerous thinking.
That’s why we are a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
For about the last fifty years your side hasn’t been able to make any gains with it’s agenda outside of the courthouse and that’s about to change for at least the next one or two generations as we return to being a constitutional republic with protections against the tyranny of the majority.
I will once again reply that it is people who it’s and are represented… not land.
And you remain completely wrong. The entire purpose of the senate is to protect the interests of the states.
It is the various districts, determined by population that is represented in the house.
We don’t even elect presidents by the popular vote.
I don’t know what you are arguing about.
I already stated that conservatives have an advantage in the Senate. They always will.
It’s quite the fantasy.
Jezcoe: BornAgainChristian: Jezcoe: BornAgainChristian: Blackwolf:Left needs to face the realty that enough of voting Americans are either apathetic or enthusiastically on board with Donald’s idiocy.
To whit: we are screwed for the foreseeable future.
BUT OBAMA/CLINTON
Away from coastal states, Obama couldn’t be elected dog catcher.
Arguing that if one excludes where the majority of the people in the country live … then “X” …is a tenuous place to be.
Its like arguing touchdowns win the game, when the other side want’s total yardage gained to count more.
Dems are becoming a coastal party, only the loons in California (in some areas) and NY (in some areas) think open borders and getting rid of ICE are good ideas.
He coasts are where the majority of the people in the country live.
It is really really dumb to say… If it weren’t for “X” then “Y” would never happen… because it is counter factual.
Flip the argument around to … if it weren’t for Texas…
See how dumb that sounds?
Irrelevant. Electoral college protects smaller states from bigger ones. Its “the United STATES”, and its not a democracy, its a Republic.
Touchdowns win the football game. The other team could have a great ground game, rack up major gains in yardage far above the other team, but if they fail to get more touchdowns, they lose the game.
Same with the election. You gotta get more electoral college votes, not popular votes.
Trump wasn’t playing the game for popular votes, he strategized for electoral votes and he got 'em.
You are correct.
But remember, the electoral surprise was won by narrow margins in States that Clinton ignored.
To act like Michigan is all of a sudden some Trumpist paradise when he won the State by a little over 10,000 votes is a little silly.
Trump ate it along with his bucket of greasy ass chicken.
“Ahem…Food for the little people.”
Go elites. You are moving further and further away from the American people