The house select committee on Jan 6

The 5th Amendment would apply how?

Fair point

I wonder if you’ll be as surprised when the mules turn out to be imaginary.

Did you reply to the wrong post or am i lost lol

Why is that your business? Did you give?

1 Like

1 Like

Yes they were.

Cities were on fire, they weren’t burned to the ground.

Nyet. We take rubles from Ukraine

1 Like

Many tours of the Capitol while it’s closed to visitors are all about checking entrances and exits, security checkpoints and the secret escape routes and taking pictures of them. Just jovial tourists.

This is what you’re hanging your Inquisition hat on?

It is the one defense I immediately thought of that allows a person to refuse to testify. You don’t have to show what crime you committed in order to claim it.
Garland claimed ongoing investigation, but that isn’t a constitutional defense against having to testify.

1 Like

I don’t think he can claim the 5th on this.

My comment on why “contact” and “close” use different magnitudes is pretty rock solid.

Care to counter it with substance rather than derision?

100 feet is 100 feet. Until “D”.

It’s the hypocrisy for me.

You have abandoned reason in exchange for swiping at progs.

Contact requires proximity much less than 100’.

A security perimeter of 100’, or an intruder reaching 100’ from a target being “close” does not require contact.

There is no hypocrisy here. Closeness is a different measure than contact.

2 Likes

You can always day dream.

A 100’ varies.

possibly, it happens.

What the difference between the two assertions? Other than really really wanting to believe one.

How many tourists get to see the House Office Building and take super interesting pictures of the staircases?

3 Likes